#SupremeCourt to hear plea seeking disclosure of data related to vaccine trials and restraining coercive action on not taking #vaccines#COVID19
Earlier, The SG while referring to a gamut of foreign judgments argued that “it is not enough that someone creates a doubt in the mind of the public with regard to vaccination, they should also try and dispel it.” lawbeat.in/top-stories/on…
Counsel appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu submits that the State is empowered to make mandates, like those who are not vaccinated will not be able to access the public places.
I have statutory power. #vaccine #Covid19
Counsel: The mandate is in larger public interest, the vaccination also helps in reducing the chances of getting virus and getting hospitals. Vaccinated people also do not mutate the virus further. #Vaccine #Covid19
Advocate Amit Anand Tiwari AAG, State of Tamil Nadu: The Central Government had issued a mandate to vaccinate all the people.
Tiwari: There is clearly a statutory provision that empowers me to issue such kind of Mandate.
(Referring to the mandate issued by Tamil Nadu Government) #Vaccine #Covid19
Tiwari: The Hospitals were flooded, am I as a State not eligible to take into account that has taken adverse affect on my State's medical condition?
There is data to show that More the people are vaccinated, lesser the chances of virus. #Vaccine #Covid19
Unvaccinated person are 5 times more likely to be hospitalised then that of fully vaccinated person, Tiwari added.
Tiwari: The Chances of infection are also increased. Therefore there is a clear connection between vaccination and severe consequences. #Vaccine #Covid19
Advocate Rahul Chitnis appearing for the State of Maharashtra submits, Milords maintaining 6 feets distance and putting up masks all the time becomes really difficult for that reason this mandate of vaccine is necessary.
People can say that I can take care of my own life, but taking an example of Mumbai Local, people walk on railway tracks stating I'll take care, we cannot allow that, it may also affect people travelling, Chitnis added.
Senior Advocate Guru Krishna Kumar appearing for Bharat Biotech, We have a track records, I was established in 96, I have a record of delivering 4 billion vaccine in Countries, it is developed in collaboration with ICMR. #Vaccine #Covid19 @BharatBiotech
Kumar: The efficacy which is claimed is clarified, the #Vaccine is effective in further varients as well.
Kumar: My phase three trial results were published, that publication itself we have produced.
Therefore, the alligation that the studies were not published simply doesn't stand as fact. We are looking at one of a kind problem that mankind has faced. #Vaccine #Covid19
Kumar: Any response of the Government, States, Hospitals, everybody will have to be judged in the backdrop of that position.
Kumar: What the petitioner appears to be arguing that we have some kind of right over the data, the petitioner is conscious of my proprietary right. If you access the data, half baked information is published in bits and pieces what mischief may be caused, imagine.
Kumar: The petitioner say that redact the personal information, later if some problem arises then they'll say who is that person, Milords there is no end to this.
Counsel appearing for @SerumInstIndia submitted that Milords, my data is with the regulator, I have given undertaking to the individuaps that no data will be disclosed except with the regulator.
SG Tushar Mehta said: Milords one clarification before Mr Bhushan starts, that State of Tamil Nadu said they made it mandatory as the Center said 100% vaccination, the center has no mandate, the stand of center is that it should be 100% but it is not a mandate.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan appearing for petitioner submitted that a mandate can be issued by a government provided that if Government shows that I would posses higher risk if I'm unvaccinated. The Government would have to demonstrate that I would transmit more if I'm unvaccinated
Bhushan: The mere assertion by the Government is not sufficient, the Solicitor said that I'm basing my case on the basis of some people's opinions, I'm not doing that my case is on the basis of Peer reviewed Journals, and stand taken by other countries.
The person who already had the infection is at a better position then any person who has been vaccinated and this point cannot be denied by anyone in this world, Bhushan added.
Bhushan: All cases shown by Mr Solicitor is related to small pox or pollio, all these cases are lethal, very few people are affected and those gives life long immunity, none of this situation relates to Corona virus. #Vaccine #Covid19
Bhushan: None of the vaccines except one has been given license and that is also not being used because in case of mishap they can be sued, but in other vaccines they are immune because they are protected under emergency use.
Bhushan submits that Milords RTI came after several Judgments of this Court, all these judgments said that the Right to Information is a fundamental right in a democratic society like ours.
Bhushan: Whereas, if this argument is accepted that merely because government has put in place a good system the data cannot be shared, even then the SC has said that right to information is a fundamental right and I'm not asking for any personal data, you redact all that data.
Bhushan: US Court in the Pfizer case also told that you redact the names and that is why it is now being published at a rate of 55,000 pages/ month as the details needs to be redacted, links I can share, people are now pointing out the issues. No issue of privacy, just redact.
Bhushan: Every data of every government and peer reviewed journal has shown that person who has got covid are better protect than that of people who are vaccinated, and the vaccine also does not protect a person from reinfection. #Vaccine #Covid19
Bhushan: They have not filed anything substantial to rebut what is shown in the peer reviewed journal that the vaccine will prevent reinfection, or is better than the immunity developed by the natural infection. #Vaccine #Covid19
Justice Rao: Accepting all your arguments, where are you driving?
Bhushan: Remove the mandate.
J Rao: They say there is no mandate.
Bhushan: The Centre says so, The States are mandating.
Bhushan submits that atleast they can give aggregate but segregated data otherwise how will anybody be able to examine whether what they have claimed is correct or is backed by something.
Bhushan: So far as the mandate is concerned it is arbitrary and over the data issue even if they don't release individual data, they can release category wise data and that is what the US Court did, I'm thankful for a very patient hearing.
🚨Calcutta High Court’s Suo Motu case hearing concerning #BirbhumMassacre expected at 2 PM.
Yesterday Court directed State of West Bengal to submit a status report on probe into incident in which homes were set ablaze & 10 persons including women & children were charred to death
Petitioner says that inspite of directions by court yesterday, CCTV cameras not installed
"Police and CM @MamataOfficial has been visiting the place of incident today - they have announced "packages", this is a way to influence witnesses" #BirbhumMassacre
Petitioner: The incident can be compared with 2002 in Gujarat.
Another Petitioner now highlights the various incidents of violence in Bengal. #BirbhumMassacre
#SupremeCourt hearing plea by Mumbai's former top cop Param Bir Singh seeking transfer of cases of alleged misconduct and corruption to Central Bureau of Investigation.
Senior Advocate Puneet Bali appearing for Singh submitted that I have prepared a note, want to show the shocking aspect.
Bench: Whole case is shocking.
Bali: My officers were asked to collect Rs. 100 Crores from the bars.
Bali: Maharashtra Government moved against the High Court order, also an FIR was registered on a complaint of a Bookie.
🚨Delhi Court expected to decide whether Umar Khalid will be granted bail in case(s) concerning Delhi Riots 2020 larger conspiracy at noon. #DelhiRiots#UmarKhalid
BREAKING: #KarnatakaHighCourt in a judgment today has said that "A brutal act of sexual assault on the wife, against her consent, albeit by the husband, cannot but be termed to be a rape." #MaritalRape
The bench penned that "Such sexual assault by a husband on his wife will have grave consequences on the mental sheet of the wife, it has both psychological and physiological impact on her."
"Such acts of husbands scar the soul of the wives. It is, therefore, imperative for the law makers to now “hear the voices of silence”," the bench added.
BREAKING: Calcutta High Court registers suo moto case in the incident of Rampurhat, Birbhum district where several homes were set ablaze. Chief Justice bench to hear the case today at 2pm. #BengalBurnings
Allegedly, following killing of TMC leader Bahadur Shaikh at Bogtui village in Birbhum district, several houses were set ablaze in Rampurhat in which eight people, including women & children, were charred to death @ISalilTiwari reports #bengalviolence lawbeat.in/top-stories/br…
🚨Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court Prakash Srivastava & Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj expected to shortly assemble & take up its Suo Motu Case registered in light of the gruesome murders where homes were set ablaze & bodies were charred beyond recognition #BengalBurnings
#SupremeCourt hearing case pertaining to sexual abuse in Muzzafarnagar Shelter Homes. Counsel submits that the Patna High Court has taken cognisance in a matter where a girl was trapped. He submits that CBI probe has been ordered into just one case.
ASG Madhavi Divan appears for CBI submits that they have moved an application. #SupremeCourt . She submits that “investigation is over.”
Divan: There is no investigation which is now pending, as far as the main case is concerned 19 persons have been convicted.