Firstly, a disclaimer. After compiling what I needed to see, I bought a small high-risk-high-return $Kuji bag a few days ago as mostly a long term hold. This isn't a shill, it's me "placing my money where my mouth is". Maybe your assessment of the situation will be different.
1. #Kujira is a project that has migrated to its own chain after the #Terra collapse. It's now a sovereign chain, splitting #DeFi offerings into into #dApps which provide order-book, liquidation and staking/governance capabilities.
2. The order book, titled "Fin" is functional and working well. The margin trading is not released yet, but the main functionality is smooth. The main stablecoin in use is @axelarcore's USDC. It'd be nice to see some native IBC stables, eventually.
3. The Liquidation dApp "Orca" will allow users to "liquidate multiple assets across the whole of Cosmos at the click of a button. No bots, no code, no problems.". I like this concept and it has potential. I'd be a huge fan if it can replace MEV bots. ALL MEV IS BAD MMKAY!?
4. The governance/staking dApp is "Blue". Firstly, I like how the UI hides validators and doesn't sort by size - this will be great for decentralisation and I think other projects should take note. The staking mechanics are intertwined with tokenomics and are quite novel.
5. There is no inflation. Users who stake instead receive rewards based on protocol revenue, and those rewards are paid out in a "Basket of crypto" manner 0_o. The problem I see here is that there isn't much of a penalty for not being staked, so the staked percentage may be low
6. The APR for staking is currently very low (0.41%), which is worse than at a fiat bank - however, because there is no inflation it's actually better than other #CosmosEcosystem DEXs. There are still a lot of staked tokens, and I think many of these would be non-retail.
7. Continuing on tokenomics, during the migration from #Terra, for some reason, 30 million community tokens were burnt, meaning that VCs and the team will hold a higher percentage of tokens
8. And if you look at the IDO price (18c/token) they may be tempted to dump for the current price.
9. The vesting schedule is pretty quick too. There are currently ~76mil tokens, with a max of ~120 in Nov'23. That's around 3 mil tokens released a month. Keep in mind that if this was seen as inflation, the equivalent rate would be 47%, which is reasonable and not a red flag.
10. Their roadmap has progressed quickly so far, and these are the next few items on the list. Since they've hit all their other targets, I think it's probable that they will hit these too.
11. The Devs/Team are Anon. I usually don't like investing in anon teams, as it increases the risk of rug pulls many times over. However, looking at their GitHub there are some really well-known Devs that have pitched in, increasing my confidence of this project delivering.
12. Also, it seems like $KUJI could be making a play for its own stablecoin. There's a lot of stables being developed within IBC, so I think the chances of any particular one reaching adoption is slim (only bullish on $SHD which I hold). However, it's a potential extra reward.
13. Price. The price is increasing as $Kuji becomes more known. Maybe it'll drop again, IDK - make your own assessment when to buy in. However, the MC is 54mil - which makes this project relatively cheap compared to $OSMO (497 mil), but much more than $ROWAN (13mil).
14. Alongside the price rising, $Kuji is also currently #5 on @mapofzones by IBC volume, with a steady increase of transactions seen over the past 30 days, meaning it's probably not a one-off pump.
15. The idea that tipped me towards buying $KUJI is that most people invest/gamble with their emotions and KUJI has a following from #Terra that may be emotionally invested and have some loss-aversion from the collapse, meaning $Kuji may not struggle for publicity like other DEXs
16. Upcoming competitors for the order book (and liquidations?) are @SeiNetwork and @dydx. These may be better, only time will tell. However, $KUJI has a decent first-mover advantage. If people get excited about their order-book, then they could pump as much as $OSMO did, which
17. was 1/3 of ATOM's market cap, or an equivilent of $1B (18x) now. That's a maximum and I really don't expect it to reach or overtake $OSMO though (8x).
19. PS, @martyvb2 showed me @BlackWhaleDeFi. It's a community-run market maker for the #Kujira order-book. It looks really interesting, but is outside the scope of this thread (DYOR)
After reading the revised Atom 2.0 roadmap (7400 words), here is my overview of the essential concepts within, summarised in 22 tweets.
•The Cosmos Network is an association of autonomous communities connected economically and ideologically with the Cosmos Hub.
• The vision of the Cosmos Network, as laid out in 2016, (1/24)
has been realized with the creation of a secure software stack for building and connecting application specific blockchains.
• The needs of the interchain have evolved, and accordingly, (2/22)
On $JUNO halvening:
Assuming market cap remains the same, all inflation does is take some value from all JUNO holders (like tax) and redistribute it to the stakers. Less inflation means the unstaked holders lose less value, and the staked holders get less returns.
Mini thread:
The spreadsheet where you can play with the numbers yourself is below. In summary, if all other factors don't changed stakers will receive roughly 9% less return per year. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…
And for anyone who is wondering why I've used 28% as the $JUNO inflation, read this previous thread of mine from waaaaay back: @Bro_n_Bro , @mintscanio & @SmartStake still use the wrong numbers for inflation / APR :(
Here's how the top 10 #OsmosisZone pools stack up after factoring in inflation, fees, APRs & incentives.
Green = better than staking
Red = worse than staking
Read on for a link to my spreadsheet and explanation/notes.
Observations:
-Staking $OSMO is still bad. Stride MEV won't make much of a difference ($2k a day extra income split between all stakers is less than 0.1% extra)
-Pooling $EVMOS, $ATOM and $JUNO worse than staking.
-Pooling $STARS, $CRO or any AXL tokens good. USDC/OSMO pool great
Why is this different to Dexmos / APRs? Because it accounts for inflation. (as well as pool fees, external rewards etc). Basically, if you have 10% APR, but inflation is more than 10%, you're losing money. As you can see, not accounting for inflation gives very different returns.
Here's an interesting table that takes #CosmosEcosystem#crypto and compares the amounts being unbonded to the total circulating supply, as well as to the currently unbonded supply. If you hold $KUJI in particular, but also $JUNO, $AKT or $SCRT you may want to read below:
1. So, a fairly safe assumption is that any coins being unbonded are doing so to predominantly be sold. Some may be being moved to DeFi or liquid staking protocols, but I think that's a small percentage.
2. By staking a coin, it's taken out of circulation for a while. The pool that can be bought/sold becomes smaller, and therefore any buy or sell pressure has a stronger effect on price.
Rebus is a chain built on Cosmos SDK and using Tendermint consensus (like everything else in the Cosmos Ecosystem). It's aimed at bringing TradFi banks and investors into Crypto. Let's start with a few assumptions on which Rebus success is based.
[...]
Assumption 1: Crypto will grow substantially. This is fair, as crypto MC is 5% of S&P500 MC and 10% of gold MC. $BTC in itself is about 5% of gold MC.
I agree with this assumption - however, chains that have growth potential without total crypto MC growing are better.
[...]
I'm sensing a bit of $JUNO hype again. Some people are calling for a return to ATH; 9x from here. My take is based on the graph below (JUNO vs ATOM). Its ATH was 1.5x $ATOM, with plateaus either side at around the 1:1 area. I wouldn't be surprised if it regained parity soon...
... but I'd be surprised if $JUNO moons without more money coming in and raising the atom price concurrently.