1/ There are 63 decentralized stablecoins on Defi Llama

Yet Aave and Curve are about to join the crowded market.

So, I researched 25 #DeFi stablecoins to understand:

• How do they function & keep the peg?
• What are their use cases and risks?
• What makes them special?

2/ 14.2% of the total $1.07T crypto market is stablecoins!

Just 3 ( $USDT $USDC and $BUSD) dominate 90% of the total stablecoin market cap.

In contrast, 63 smart-contract based #DeFi stablecoins together amount to a mere 8.3% ($11.72B) share.

Dwarfs against $USDT Image
3/Terra's $UST collapse wiped out half of the decentralized stablecoin market cap.

In April 2022 UST market cap was higher than Maker's DAI.

But UST collapsed due to algorithmic model design flaws, leaving DAI the leading #DeFi stablecoin. Image
4/ By the way, for a more detailed explanation please chech the blog post


You can also find each stablecoin comparison table at ignasdefi.notion.site
5/ $UST collapsed because Terra valued capital efficiency to create currency cheaply more than peg stability.

Maker's $DAI prioritizes peg stability & decentralization.

The Holy Grail is achieving all 3, but every project has to compromise on one. Image
6/ There are 3 more algorithmic stablecoins you should know about:

• $USDD: Minting is centralized and limited to 9 Tron DAO members.
• $USDN: Current collateral ratio is only 11% 🚨
• $CUSD: Minted only by $CEL but more transparent than other two.

7/ Over-collateralization ensures hard peg mechanism, but is capital inefficient.

Maker requires more than $1 USD worth of collateral to open a Collateral Debt Position (CDP) to mint 1 DAI.

Maker accepts various crypto assets and experiments with Real World Assets as well. Image
8/ A few projects dared to challenge Maker.

Abracadabra's MIM uses a wide range and complex collateral, including interest-bearing tokens, such as Stargate's USDC.

This can backfire.

MIM suffered from $UST collateral and the market cap eventually dropped from $4.6B to $220M. Image
9/ @LiquityProtocol's $LUSD is like Maker Lite.

ETH is the sole collateral accepted.

It shuns cumbersome Maker governance model, offers borrowing at 0% interest rate and collateral rate is only 110%.

Smart-contracts are immutable and minting fees are algorithmically adjusted. Image
10/ Tron's $JUST, Kava's $USDX and $MAI also use Maker's CDP model.

Why two stablecoins for Tron?

t makes sense to prefer USDD instead of JUST as it doesn't need to be over-collateralized.

Tron can just mint a lot more USDD than JUST with the same amount of $TRX.
11/ Quite a few stablecoins bring innovation beyond Maker's CDP with the focus on capital efficiency or rewards.

Aave's $GHO fall to this category as well.

$GHO will support deposited assets on its lending market, RWA & delta-neutral positions for capital efficiency. Image
12/ At this point, we can see that algorithmic stablecoins are more capital efficient, but unstable.

Over-collateralized stables have hard peg mechanism, but issuing money is expensive.

👀There are a few stablecoins that are trying to find the perfect middle.
13/ Frax, is a fractional-algorithmic stablecoin: partially backed by collateral and partially stabilized algorithmically.

It started 100% collateralized by USDC, but later some of the value that enters into the system during minting becomes FXS (which is then burned).
14/ In a 90% collateral ratio (CR), every FRAX minted requires $0.9 of collateral and burning $0.1 of FXS.

In a 95% CR, every FRAX minted requires $0.95 of collateral and burning $0.05 of FXS, and so on.

Thanks to it, Frax is the 2nd largest DeFi stablecoin after DAI. Image
15/ @UXDProtocol

Few have heard about $UXD, as the market cap is only $21M.

It uses delta-neutral position derivates to keep the peg.

When 1 $SOL is deposited, the protocol opens a short positions on @mangomarkets to earn funding rate, which is distributed to UXD holders. Image
16/ However, the biggest innovation in #DeFi stablecoins is Automated Market Operations.

You see, the Fed engages in "Open Market Operations" by minting $USD to buy securities, lend to banks etc.

This way it influences the money supply and manipulates interest rates. Image
17/ Several stablecoins learnt well from the Fed.

Frax's v2 monetary policy can issue new $FRAX as long as it does not change the FRAX price off its peg.

Protocol can algorithmically mint FRAX and deposit it to Curve, Aave or anywhere else that the DAO deems beneficial. Image
18/ AMOs have the following effects:

• Decreases borrowing rate on lending markets, making FRAX more attractive to borrow.
• Curve AMO ensures deep liquidity and strengthens the peg
• Generates revenue for the protocol
• Increases FRAX supply.

19/ Under different names, other protocols below do the brrrrrrrrrr a well:

• Maker's D3M on Aave
@Synthetix about to launch DDM.
@AngleProtocol mints $agEUR to @eulerfinance
@InverseFinance's Whale Extractable Value
@AlchemixFi Elixir's AMOs
@feiprotocol's LaaS Image
20/ In short, AMOs increase capital efficiency by creating money cheaply or at no cost.

At the same time it generates revenue for the protocol.

Those operations are complex, just take a look at Alchemix's Elixir AMO below 🤓 Image
21/ This also partly explains why Aave and Curve are launching their own stablecoins.

Aave and Curve need liquidity to generate revenue.

Currently they attract liquidity thanks to liquidity mining, so with their own stablecoins they'll increase capital efficiency to LPs.
22/ While their tokens will require collateralization, AMOs will allow Aave and Curve to mint stablecoins at little to no cost and increase revenue generation beyond their own protocols. Image
23/ As more stablecoins add AMOs, yields for stablecoins will continue to drop.

Lending rates will drop even for USDT, BUSD and USDC (and other crypto assets) as they will be deposited as collateral to borrow FRAX, DAI etc., at low interest rates to farm elsewhere.
24/ This could potentially jump start a new bull run, as leverage will become cheaper and liquidity abundant.
25/ Finally, I haven't mentioned @OriginProtocol's $OUSD, @mstable_'s $MUSD or $FEI.

These protocols are like hedge funds, generating revenue to depositors.

But with yields low and risks increasing, they're having hard time generating revenue.

If you liked the thread, I'd appreciate a kind LIKE and retweet ♥️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Ignas | DeFi Research

Ignas | DeFi Research Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DefiIgnas

Aug 20
1/ $FEI Protocol is shutting down.

At $188M market cap, it's one of the largest #DeFi stablecoins.

Yet, it's closing down.

Why? 🧵
2/ In early 2021 Fei Labs raised $1.3B USD in #ETH to build a decentralized stablecoin.

That ETH raised was used as collateral for it's stablecoin $FEI.
3/ $FEI is different from other stablecoins such as $DAI

Fei is collateralized by various crypto assets, but in contrast to DAI, those assets are 'owned' by the protocol.

Users 'sell' crypto to get FEI.

The 'sold' asset is included in the Protocol controlled value (PCV).
Read 14 tweets
Aug 17
1/Terra's $UST collapsed 3 months ago.

Yet 3 major stablecoins are still using UST's algorithmic model:

• Tron's $USDD
• Wave's $USDN
• Celo's $CUSD

Is it worth the risk to hold them?

Let's find out 🧵
2/ Short reminder:

algorithmic stables are minted by depositing $1 worth of a volatile asset to issue $1 worth stablecoin.

For Terra, $1 USD of LUNA to mint 1 UST.

If UST price falls below $1, anyone could buy UST to mint LUNA at $1 then sell LUNA at a profit.
3/ The model is capital efficient:

as demand for UST increases, it boosts buying pressure & price for LUNA.

When the price of LUNA goes up, lower amount of it is needed to mint 1 UST.

On the way down, the process is reversed, which eventually lead to UST collapse.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 4
1/ More #DeFi projects are adopting veTokenomics.

I researched 20+ veToken ecosystem projects to understand:

• Why?
• How it works?
• What makes it special?

Here's what you’ll need to know 🧵
2/First things first. The price.

veTokenomics isn't a panacea to all #DeFi problems.

veTokens are highly inflationary and with the exception of $CRV all major veTokens underperformed $ETH in the past year.
3/Then why are more projects adopting the model?

The success metric in #DeFi is Total Value Locked.

So projects give away their own tokens as rewards to attract liquidity.

Yet without proper token value proposition, these tokens get sold away.

Let's look at @compoundfinance
Read 26 tweets
Aug 1
1/ The latest @spencernoon newsletter is full of great insight on L1s adoption.

For example,

guess which #blockchain had the most Daily Active Addresses in the past 12 months?

Vote before finding out below 👇
#ethereum, #BSC, #Polygon or #Solana
2/ Just in case you peeped before voting, first consider the protocol revenue.

In the past year #ethereum was an absolute leader with $10b in revenue followed by:

#BSC - $883M
#Avalanche - $129M
#Solana - $43.3M
#Polygon - $24.1M

!BSC generated more fees than #BTC! Image
3/ So you might assume that #ethereum had the most daily active addresses.

But no.

#BSC typically had >80% more DAA than $ETH.

Only #Solana boasted with a comparable number of active addresses.

@cz_binance is up to something here 👀 Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 26
1/ What's next for #DeFi?🤔

I researched roadmaps of 25 major protocols to find out.

A lot is coming up: protocol-owned-stablecoins, new tokenomics, decentralization plans, The End Game for Maker and more.

These are the top 7 trends coming for DeFi 🧵
2/ First of all, the past year for #DeFi was brutal.

DeFi tokens have been sinking against #ETH since at least October 2020.

DeFi Pulse Index, which tracks major DeFi tokens, has dropped 69% against $ETH just in the past year alone.
3/ Why?

• Inflationary design of DeFi tokenomics
• Lack of protocol revenue redistribution to the token holders.
• Attractive #ETH staking APY

For example, the only use case for Uniswap's $UNI is to vote and 0% of its generated fees are distributed to the UNI holders.
Read 17 tweets
Jul 11
1/ What will happen to your #BTC, #ETH and other #crypto assets in case you die?

An important 🧵
2/Your own death isn't the most fun topic to think about, but it's crucial to have a plan

A plan to transfer (life-changing) money to your loved ones

Without it your crypto is likely gone forever, locked in a digital wallet/exchange that can’t be accessed
3/The asset recovery plan depends on where the tokens are stored:

· Centralized exchange or;
· In a cold/hot wallet and only accessible with a seed phrase/private keys
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!