So, to recap, a mature, (relatively) successful top 20 #DeFi project held a critical on-chain vote for the highest position that's maintained tons of controversy, headlines, & discussion since it launched...
and 2% voter turnout that really was a 5-person vote amongst VCs @nlw
So, what's done is done. Where does #Sushi go from here?
Well, first let's determine what Sushi is and what it's up against...
There is no order book for SushiSwap, and instead, the buying and selling of crypto is facilitated by smart contracts based on an algorithm and the liquidity pool depth. @thedefiedge
Sushi's main differentiator after forking UNI is its rewards being distributed in SUSHI tokens
Liquidity providers on SushiSwap are rewarded with the protocol’s $SUSHI tokens which also act as a governance token for these token holders to participate in having a say in protocol changes.
As discussed, the governance part is debatable. @eli5_defi
SUSHI holders can also continue to earn rewards after they stop providing liquidity, unlike $UNI holders.
Users provide tokens through the liquidity pool and funds into this pool in token pairs, which provide the funds needed to complete swaps.
Like Uniswap, SushiSwap LPs are rewarded for providing liquidity via a percentage of swap revenue.
SushiSwap also offers a range of other DeFi services that are indicative of the SushiSwap team’s innovative outlook.
While Uniswap focuses on being a #DEX, SushiSwap is more focused on more products, such as Shoya, its planned #NFT marketplace, and BentoBox, a token locker for dApps.
As well as listing on numerous alt chains although pool creation has declined this year @Delphi_Digital
While Uniswap is a more widely used exchange and maintains a much higher TVL as of September 2022, SushiSwap has been more innovative with experimenting with new features since its launch.
SushiSwap also offered a different incentive system for liquidity providers. @DefiLlama
@DefiLlama On Uniswap, 0.3% of a pool’s liquidity is shared equally among LPs.
On SushiSwap, 0.25% of the pool’s trading fees go to LPs in a ratio, and an additional 0.05% is converted into SUSHI and spread to token holders.
Uniswap’s liquidity mining program to incentivize liquidity providers is also no longer active at this time, while that of SushiSwap continues to be online.
Uniswap v3 offers concentrated liquidity to allow users to form larger swaps, while SushiSwap does not offer this feature.
Finally, Uniswap does not offer any extra rewards to new tokens on its platform, while SushiSwap offers what’s called the “Onsen Program.” This is a liquidity provision strategy for new tokens.
SUSHI Tokenomics
SushiSwap added an incentive structure to its ecosystem with its own governance token, SUSHI.
During the initial days of the protocol, this made the DEX popular for token holders who wanted to have a say in changes to the protocol.
These days...
While SUSHI initially had an infinite supply, a proposal that suggested capping the supply at 250M SUSHI was adopted by the community.
The current expected date for this supply cap to be reached is November 2023.
For the first 100,000 blocks following the SUSHI distribution launch, SushiSwap minted 1,000 SUSHI tokens per block to the stakers of each supported pool.
This was all happening during Sushi’s liquidity drain from Uniswap.
After the 100,000th block, rewards of SUSHI dropped to 100 SUSHI per block. Rewards are set to decrease until the max supply cap of SUSHI is reached. 10% of all emissions go to the SushiSwap multi-sig development fund.
SUSHI can be staked in return for xSUSHI, which receives voting rights as well as fees, including 0.05% on swaps. 2/3rd of SUSHI earned via staking in xSUSHI pools is time-locked for six months.
When a user withdraws their SUSHI, they receive back whatever fees they earned during the time they were holding xSUSHI. The SUSHI token can also be staked across various platforms and used as collateral across other Ethereum DeFi platforms such as on Aave.
That's a wrap!
If you enjoyed this thread:
1. Follow me @mt_1466 for more of these 2. RT the tweet below to share this thread with your audience
At a high level, there are three entities involved in a rollup transaction:
- the user on the rollup
- the rollup operator
- #Ethereum L1.
The rollup operator that sits in between the user and mainnet has tremendous responsibility and also some power.
Within this framework, there are also three crucial actors in the collection, execution, and finalization of a ZKR block:
- sequencers
- provers
- validators (verifier)
Is the looming $XRP-SEC settlement the end of an epic battle or just the beginning?
With a decision possibly coming as soon as this year, #crypto needs to be prepared for any outcome.
Let's do a quick review and then look ahead..... 🧵
Gary Gensler, Chairman of the #SEC, has repeatedly been on the record that he believes most cryptocurrencies outside of #Bitcoin are securities.
In September, Gensler was quoted, “the nearly 10,000 tokens in the crypto market, I believe the vast majority are securities…
the investing public is buying or selling crypto security tokens because they’re expecting profits derived from the efforts of others in a common enterprise.”
While the SEC has levied successful lawsuits against several minor crypto projects from the 2017 #ICO days...
Ethereum just moved to #PoS but #Avalanche and its C-Chain have been PoS for ~2 years. So, what's the big deal?
How does $AVAX PoS work?
How does its consensus algo differ from what ETH just implemented?
And can #Avalanche truly have a million+ validators one day??
The Avalanche network doesn’t use just one consensus mechanism but rather a collection of consensus protocols.
What is the Primary Network?
A three-chain (X, P, and C) system that segregates the work done by the overall network.
This enables more efficient use of network resources & the ability to process more txs simultaneously.
Avalanche’s primary network consists of three governing blockchains with diff consensus algos:
Underneath all the songs, pandas, and memes, the #EthereumMerge is bittersweet.
5+ years of waiting, and it's finally here!... Only, it's not like I imagined.
A thread on the ugly/glass-half-empty side of the #Merge from a long-time $ETH bull...
It's going to be impossible to make my argument and not sound whiny or a buzzkill or ungrateful or simply FUDing. That's not my intention. But like with everything, the merge comes with a cost.
However, lemme stress, this is a HUGE accomplishment. Kudos to all the devs involved
Backing up a bit.... blockchains are ONLY worth a damn if they are permissionless, neutral, secure, & censorship-resistant.
That's the truth. If you don't have those, you simply have a corruptible database.
And 99% of the thousands of projects out there don't offer these traits
SNARKs allow someone to prove they have a particular piece of info without actually revealing the contents of the info.
Popularized by @zcash for enabling anonymous txs, zk tech provides scaling efficiencies for the rollup chain that are then submitted to the main chain.