Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta begins hearing the plea.
Counsel for Yousuf informs the court that NIA has given the FIR yesterday . The Special Judge Trial Court will give the Remand Application today at 2 pm, as the NIA remand is getting over today.
Counsel appearing for NIA informs the bench that the FIR & GROUNDS OF ARREST have been given and the Arrest memo also have been given to the counsels.
Counsel for Yusuff informs the bench about the Special Judge, trial court vide order dated Septemver 26 (remand application) wherein the Judge stated that FIR will not be given as the case is at the initial stage of investigation.
Additionally, Counsel (for Yusuff) said that the remand application will be provided by the Special Judge at 2 PM today
Court: You are presuming that it will be given to you. You have already challenged same before this court and both are at diffrent footings.
Court asked Counsel for Yusuff that on what basis do they invoke Art 226? That how is the case maintainable ?
Counsel for NIA contends that he has already recieved the FIR and remand application. #PFI
Court asks Counsel for Yusuff as to hat is their stand? You want to keep it pending?
Counsel for Yusuff: We can keep it pending Milords.
Counsel for Yusuff contends that it is the remand application through what we get to know what is the offence.
Counsel for #NIA states that Yusuff filed an application u/s 50 and it has been complied with effectively.
He states that the counsel is already Stating that he'll get the Remand Application, if he gets it, fine, if he doesn't then he can take actions accordingly. #pfiban #PFI
BREAKING: Court states that the remand application is maintained by the Investigating Officer and the ACCUSED DOESN'T HAVE AN INHERENT RIGHT TO THE REMAND APPLICATION.
Additionally, the Court noting that an adjournment has been sought by the counsel for Petitioner.
The Court adjourns the matter and lists the matter for November 11. #PFI #PFIBan
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If a Muslim man is not capable of fostering his first wife and children then as per the mandate of the Holy Quran, he cannot marry another woman: Allahabad High Court #Quran#bigamy#allahabadhighcourt
Religious mandate of Sura 4 Ayat 3 is binding on all Muslim men which specifically mandates all Muslim men to deal justly with orphans and only then they can marry 2,3 or 4 women but if a Muslim man fears that he'll not be able to do so then he can marry only one: Allahabad HC
The court observed this while rejecting a Muslim man's plea seeking restoration of conjugal rights whose first wife had refused to live with him as he married another woman without informing her and later asked her to share his consortium with the other woman. #AllahabadHighCourt
Supreme Court to hear Enforcement Directorate's appeal against Bombay High Court's decision granting bail to former Maharashtra Minister Anil Deshmukh in PMLA case. #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Court has been informed that SG Tushar Mehta appearing for ED is on his legs before another court.
Case gets passed over.
#DelhiHighCourt to hear plea filed by Khushi Rainbow Home for Girls & Umeed Aman Ghar for Boys, run by Centres for Equity Studies (CES) of which Activist& Writer Harsh Mander is director.
The plea has sought quashing of inspection report of @NCPCR_
In Oct 2020, the @NCPCR_ raided the children's home and allegedly sought to know whether the children participated in the anti-CAA protests, about foreign funding, and whether shelter was given to Rohingya children at the two places. #Rohingya#children#shelterhome#CAA
As per @NCPCR_ report of 2021, it stated that there were many violations of Juvenile Justice Act and other various irregularities at the two homes. It also stated that there were instances of child sexual abuse at the home for boys.
#SupremeCourt A Constitution Bench to decide practice of excommunication in #DawoodiBohra Community whether a protected practice.
SG Tushar Mehta submits that even if the lis between parties does not exist, some issues may still survive, which the constitutional court may decide upon.
He further refers to the Sabrimala judgment challenged before a 9 judge bench and asks the court to tag the present matter along with it.
🚨#GyanvapiCase: Varanasi Court today to pronounce order on Hindu worshipers' plea seeking scientific investigation of 'Shivalinga' found in the Wazookhana- a spot for Namazis to perform ablutions before prayers. #VaranasiCourt#Gyanvapi
The Hindu plaintiffs have argued that the 'Shivlinga' is part of the suit property and under Order 26 Rule 10A of CPC, the court can issue a commission for its scientific investigation (including carbon dating). #VaranasiCourt#gyanvapi
On the other hand, the mosque management committee has alleged that the concerned Shivlinga-like structure is a fountain that is not currently in use.
District Judge Ajay Krishna Vishwesha is likely to pronounce orders at around 2 pm today. #VaranasiCourt#Gyanvapi