You might have seen the word #Holodomor going around. It is what the world calls the last #GenocideOfUkrainians by #Russia. A quick break down. Stalin needed cash to pay for a rapid industrialization of the Soviet economy. Grain sales were a major source of foreign currency.
Outwardly facing and using useful idiots like the @nytimes' Walter Duranty played up the idea of a workers and peasants paradise all the while knowing that starvation was occurring. Inwardly, the #Russian public was shown agit prop films and propaganda portraying the Ukrainian's
as evil counter-revolutionaries who were hoarding food and deserved to be punished. There were further problems stemming from collectivization leading to poorer yields and the whole was something between 3-7 million dead. If the upper number is true it represents a greater number
of people killed because of their identity than the #Holocaust though a much larger percentage of #Ukrainians survived Stalin than European Jews survived Hitler. This Holodomor or holocaust of Ukrainians is why so many Ukrainians welcomed the Nazis in June 1941. How could they
not, they did not know the devil arriving on panzers but they did know the devil with black booted NKVD executioners. Its also the root of Bandera's popularity. He killed Russians who delighted in killing Ukrainians. Of course Russia does not want you to know this. They want you
too assume that Bandera and Ukrainians hate for Russia sprang fully formed from Nazi Germany rather than as a responsive reflex from a people subjected to a Moscow directed famine so bad there are credible reports of cannibalism in a land that literally sprouts food from the
ground in such abundance that in 2022 the latest Russian war of #genocide caused fears of global famine. The world cheered on Stalin in 1932-33 because of Kleptograd's dis-info efforts. It is our duty 90 years later to quash similar efforts by similar actors. In fact that is one
#Ukraine and when the Allies disengaged from the Russian civil war the area was reabsorbed into a reborn Russian Empire called the USSR. We must not let that happen again. I tag @JohnBoozman, @SenTomCotton and @RepFrenchHill every day: send more, send better, send now. Ukraine
has pushed Russia back with victory after victory but much of Ukraine is still occupied and it must be freed. The deported populations must be returned and Russia's ability to pursue #colonialism and genocide must be curtailed. Never Again includes the Holodomor. Stand with them
as they fight to finally be free of #RussiaisATerroistState. Until Ukraine Wins On Ukraine's Terms: Slava Ukraini! #UkraineWillWin#RussiaIsLosing@mfa_russia <--- still losing and there is a bigger chance that Ukraine is here to remember the 100th anniversary of the Holodomor
than the Russian Federation still existing.
PS: despite Bandera being a national hero, and Russia calling Ukrainians "Banderites" as a synonym for Nazi. In Ukraine the far Right failed to win any seats in the Radar. Ukraine is a multi-ethnic multi-cultural society that tends to center-left not hard right.
Today I am going to piggy back off both yesterday's essay and two people I respect but in this case disagree with. Both are probably smarter than me and at least one of them operated at the heights of military power so this essay may well be hubris on my part. I'll let you be the
judge. Yesterday was of course a brief thumbnail history of why strategic bombing doesn't work. Not working is however not the same as not killing, destroying, and causing untold misery which is why this tweet exists:
I did not hear @general_ben's actual words but I am going to proceed as the tweet is a faithful accounting. First I don't have any moral qualms about #Ukraine hitting naval facilities or airfields where missile launching platforms are located. In fact having weapons able to sink
In the 1920's and 30's there was a massive debate going on. An Italian Giullio Douhet had theorized that future wars would be won by strategic bombing. His theories gained a lot of traction. Famously Billy Mitchell and Hugh Trenchard (father of the RAF) were converts to his ideas
on the future of war. Mitchell went so far as to sink an old German battleship to "prove" the concept. Though he was accused of cheating (opening doors, no crews to do damage control etc) the ship did sink.
in that era they really thought they were on to something. Bombers of the same generation as fighters tended to be faster, could fly higher and at least on paper could defend themselves. Of course, each new generation of bomber sparked a new generation of fighter that took
Hey @mtracey I would like to answer a question for you. You asked how many Jews were saved by US (military) intervention in the Holocaust. Its a complex question but bears directly on the ongoing #GenocideOfUkrainians occurring today. So lets start with the basics. The estimates
are the 2 of every 3 Jews living in Europe in 1939 had vanished by 1945. I say vanished vs dead because some few managed to flee to nations that did not end up under the Nazi boot. In addition, the number is self is less than absolute because so many records were destroyed so
there is legitimately a grey area but its on the margins. The accepted consensus is there were 9 million jews in Europe prior to WWII. encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/art…
Yesterday I talked about the carnage outside Bakhmut resembling Flanders fields, and the type of battle resembling Verdun and how that would shatter the Russian Army. Today I am going to expound on why I think this is the case. Armies shattering after failed offensives is not an
unknown thing. There are 3 really good examples from WWI and they all have some things in common. The Kerensky Offensive, The Nivelle Offensive and The German Spring Offensive of 1918 especially the later offensives that targeted the French and Americans.
All of them involved armies that had been absolutely mauled, poorly defined strategic objectives and a leadership disconnected from the trauma suffered by the troops. In the Kerensky Offensive, Gen Brusilov who had almost knocked Austria Hungary out of the war a year earlier
The pictures showing the carnage of #Bakhmut are straight from Flanders 1917... Chewed up ground and bodies lying row by row where they were mowed down like grass. Then there is the video of the SU-30S going down in flames. Add in yesterday's video showing a KAMAZ truck
that was turned into a sieve and the picture is pretty clear: #Russia is fucked. While I am very happy that Russia finds itself in this position, it didn't have to be this way. Had Russia stayed the course it started in 2012 and not brought Shoigu to the fore the war likely would
have gone much differently and might well be over by now. A decade's worth of real reform and re-arming would have made the Russian's much better at what they tried to do. Even if they were only twice as good (still bad by Western standards) and started a month later or earlier
Good morning, with all the dour news from partisanship to whatever is going on with Twitter I thought I would start my daily essay with some comedy. hat tip to @wartranslated
That truck is the ultimate catfish for a mechanic. From 50 feet away you might think its repairable... up close its total scrap. Imagine being a flesh and blood creature when that rain of metal comes down? Yeah that parts not funny. What will drill neat little holes in steel
will pink mist anyone unlucky enough to be caught in it. No wonder the Russian's have decided running is better than driving. More and more reports coming in that the latest tranche of Russian Lend Lease to Ukraine will not disappoint. Though to be honest I don't know if that is