But the problem isn’t about efficacy, it’s about reach.
A medicalized approach is only one part of a broader strategy. We cannot expect a prescriber-driven approach to meet the needs of tens of thousands of British Columbians at risk of fatal drug poisoning.
And these programs are primarily funded by Health Canada, not the province.
The incoming fiscal cliff of this funding stream is deeply concerning.
Many programs have no idea if funding will be extended beyond March 2023. That’s less than three months from now.
But on the outside we have provinces like #Alberta saying “BC has flooded its streets with safe supply, and it’s not working”.
The lie of BC’s #SafeSupply is fuelling anti-safe supply rhetoric outside BC.
Meanwhile, by all accounts, safe supply dispensations in BC is declining.
And that is how incrementalism and government misinformation kills a movement.
We need a #SafeSupply that includes a range models.
We need to support the scale up of existing medical models.
We need a public health model.
We need visible support for non-medical models.
So when the next report on drug poisoning deaths gets released, do not settled for lies.
We must replace the entire unregulated drug supply with regulated drugs accessible to all.
Year after year in so-called #Canada, we see more of our loved ones, friends, neighbours, and community members killed by a failure to address the volatility of the unregulated drug supply.
This is not a crisis of ‘opioids’ or ‘overdose’—people are being poisoned.
We are talking about drug regulation, consumer rights, and bodily autonomy.
@kwardvancouver says it best:
“We must replace the entire illicit drug supply with regulated substances accessible to all”
As @ABDanielleSmith shuffles the cabinet and dispenses her favours, let’s take a quick look at the storied history of being a #UCP “Minister of Mental Health and Addictions”.
Next, let’s see what the Ass. Minister has had to say about SCS and #harmreduction.
Surely his beliefs about Big Pharma funding research for harm reduction, and that #naloxone is an enabler couldn’t have impacted the committees viewpoints?