OG: @pandanaiksapi: #Binance is the largest crypto exchange in the world with a daily volume of over $15 billion, 10x bigger than the second. It's considered the safest for trading and storing #crypto assets, but is it truly #SAFU? #crypto#trading
A 🧵from a stupid trader (1/?)
Binance, founded by @cz_binance in 2017, has its origins in China. Due to the government's ban on #crypto, it had to move its headquarters to Japan. However, as Japan also started to implement stricter regulations for #crypto, Binance had to move again, this time to Malta. (2/?)
On Feb 21, 2020, the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) announced that @binance does not have an operating license. Binance has also been investigated multiple times by the IRS and the US Department of Justice on charges of money laundering.
In 2019, Binance, which was banned in the US, opened @BinanceUS, a separate exchange with policies adjusted to comply with US regulations. @BinanceUS only serves users from the US, and US citizens cannot open an account on Binance.
(4/?)
This separation allows @BinanceUS and @binance to operate according to the regulations of the US authorities. However, many suspected that Binance is still operating illegally in the US and there are often transfers between #Binance and #BinanceUS.
Why are transfers between @Binance and @BinanceUS a problem?
US customers funds have to be backed 1:1. However, with transfers between the two companies, the funds are not guaranteed, and Binance could potentially take funds from the US.
This transfer of funds (#Commingling) is a big issue for their customers' assets, and @binance shouldn't do this. It is similar to what happened between FTX and Alameda, where FTX lent Alameda customer funds for Alameda's trading.
@binance is issuing stablecoins under the name Binance USD called $BUSD, in partnership with #Paxos. As the manager, #Paxos maintains the value (peg) of BUSD by guaranteeing the $BUSD issued on the ERC-20 network through cash in the Paxos treasury and US Treasuries.
(8/?)
For ease of transaction, Binance issues Binance-peg BUSD on other networks, locks BUSD on the ERC-20 in the Binance Wallet, and issues it. This Binance-Peg BUSD is natively on the Binance Chain network.
But there had been issues: @business reported that in the years 2020&2021 Binance-Peg $BUSD was often "undercollateralized" meaning tokens issued exceed the guarantees provided by Binance. Over three events, the gap was over $1 billion.
A spokesperson for #Binance replied that "the Binance-Peg $BUSD management and underwriting process doesn't always run flawlessly, but Binance has made much better improvements with more sophisticated collateral checks."
A spokesperson for Binance also acknowledged that there had been problems in managing their stablecoins, not only limited to $BUSD, but also other tokens including $USDC.
The twitter account @DataFinnovation revealed that there have been numerous instances where stablecoins traded on Binance have exhibited strange behavior and instances of undercollateralization.
Because as a token with a 1:1 value to fiat, public trust depends on whether the token truly has a fiat value, as evidenced by collateral money or other assets with equivalent value to the stablecoins in circulation.
(14/?)
The #LUNA Token crash was caused by their stablecoin, #UST, being depegged from $1, triggering a drop in crypto prices. The depeg risk of a larger stablecoin like $BUSD could/will trigger a bigger crisis.
(15/?)
Recently, the US Department of Justice announced the arrest of the #Bitzlato exchange CEO. He was accused of facilitating money laundering activities, ransomware attacks, and other criminal activities. This exchange is closely connected to the Hydra darknet activities.
(16/?)
An analysis of on-chain activity from #Bitzlato revealed that one of the three biggest trading partners of this exchange had been #Binance, reinforcing accusations that Binance is involved in money laundering as the DOJ has been alleging.
#Binance has repeatedly stated that they are committed to preventing criminal activites by strictly implementing KYC/AML procedures, but this incident again reveals that there is still a lot of room for improvement in their compliance with AML laws.
#Binance own blockchain #BNBChain has also received a lot of criticism. F.e. by @cryptohippo65, who has proven that there are transactions that cannot be found in the chain explorer, including 22 million $BNB that were "stolen" by hackers in 2022.
Some even believe that Binance's #BNBBeaconChain does not operate like a #blockchain, due to the many chain errors, bugs, strange forking, and suspicious "repair tools" indicating that there is a lot of manipulation on this chain.
Back to hacks: @cz_binance can "turn off" #BSC to prevent hackers from transferring stolen BNB. While this may seem like a positive move, it demonstrates that CZ has control over BSC, undermining the principle of decentralization in the blockchain.
If a small group of individuals controls the blockchain, isn't it similar to centralized finance (CEFI) like traditional financial institutions? A great tweet from @alex_valaitis for the compliment (or satire) on @cz_binance and #BSC
@MikeBurgersburg: #BNBBeaconChain is often malfunctioning and being repaired with tools that can change and edit transaction hashes on the chain, thereby breaking the fundamental blockchain principle of immutability (unchangeable record)
The ownership of #BNB goes to @binance itself, or parties affiliated with #Binance. This makes the $BNB price much easier to control and manipulate suspects @DylanLeClair_
#Signet itself is a network owned by $SBNY that allows their clients to make intra-bank transfers anytime 24/7 in 365 days without any problems. Instant, any amount, anytime. How big is the Signet network?
$1 TRILLION in a year!
(27/?)
$SBNY refers to #Signet as #WalledGarden, claiming their clients must go through strict KYC/AML to log in. This is because $SBNY is a bank in the US that has to carry out anti-money laundering measures.
If we are going to make a deposit via bank transfer #SWIFT to @binance, the designated account number belongs to #KeyVisionDevelopment Limited at $SBNY bank, proving that @Binance is a member of #Signet.
#KeyVisionDevelopment Ltd is according to @Binance located in the Seychelles. Surprisingly, #Keyway Seychelles Ltd, which "coincidentally" has a similar name & the same address, states that it is not affiliated with #KeyVisionDevelopment. Well Lol!
The logo of both companies look pretty the same. Even the font used nearly idenctical. Very Professional right? It's normal for a normal, legal company like #KeyVisionDevelopment with whom @binance is doing business.
In one Credit Reports #KeyVisionDevelopment mentions the business transaction as "Strike-Off" and the rating is D. Hmm, the officer who made this report must be wrong, because @binance just still use them as gateway😏
Looks like #Signature Bank of New York $SBNY has done an amazing KYC/AML on #KeyVisionDevelopment before it became a #Signet customer. So, what will happen when the origins of the #Keyway group get publicly discussed?
(36/?)
It is possible that $SBNY made the decision to limit SWIFT withdrawals with a value below $100,000 for all #Signet clients including @binance. Because of their failed KYC it likely that $SBNY doesn't want to get in trouble with the US regulators?
Disclaimer: This article was written by @pandanaiksapi in indonesian language. Translated by @Annihil4tionGod. This is not my work - I just felt urg to make this collection of information available in the english language. All credits to the author and researchers!
Sooo, what is going on at #Binance? Looks like they got a new company called Binance LTD in UK, founded on 6. January 2023. 🧐
"96090 - Other service activities not elsewhere classified" - Yeah, like noone knows!
"Tools for Fools" - Webpages that will help you doing your research on Companies:
You want to know what webpages you need to investiage the company that stole you funds?
You always wanted to know more about a company? Follow this 🧵👇to learn where to start!
(1/?)
Let us begin with my favorite webpage: @opencorporates - perfect in the beginning:
+ Search is easy
+ Hugh amount of Information on Companies available
+ Sources linked for further research
+ Search for Individuals/Directors
Binance and Binance Europe LTD👇
5/5 🦭-Points
(2/?)
Northdata northdata.de - Understand Structure
+ Interactive Mindmaps
+ Adress & More
+ Information on Filings including the date but:
+/- Full access via payable subscription (49€/month)
- Just available in German (Translater will fix that 4 u)
So SSGA Funds Managment is part of State Street - while SSGA got many companies on the Cayman Islands, just saying´- while having no holdings on SSGA Funds Managment.
In their Proxy statemnt from April 2022, they mention something called "State Street Digital" which was launched by Ronald P. O’Hanley while Louis D. Maiuri was responsible for this project. sec.gov/Archives/edgar…
Good morning everyone! Time to share some #FTX research with you - today I will focus on the findings related to West Realm Shires Inc and Paper Bird Inc.
Most companies filed for bancruptcy on 11/11 - beside WRS who did 3 days later... And how is Paper Bird structured?
🧵👇
So what can we be said about West Realm Shires Inc regarding the bankruptcy filings?
Below you can find the companies who are directly owned by West Realm Shires according to different filings (did crosscheck).
Let us build a little mindmap next:
As we can see, there are quite some companies from FTX related to West Realm Shires Inc. even so I never heard about these company before yesterday.
While West Realm Shires Inc looks boring - PaperBird does not. A little walk through👇
I started to dig into the #FTX bancruptcy filings and came across some pretty interesting companies I never heard before.
Like: Paper Bird Inc. or West Realm Shires Inc.
so i started to look into these companies🧵👇👀
In the section "Pending Bankruptcy Cases Filed by the Debtor and Affiliates of the Debtor" they named a different amount of companies:
Paper Bird Inc. named 134.
West Realm Shires Inc. named 102.
Mhm, but why are these companies so interesting for me?
/2
Most companies listed are owned by FTX Trading Ltd but:
"82. Approximately 75% of FTX Trading Ltd. is owned by Paper Bird Inc., and approximately 25% is owned by third party investors."
"88. 100% of the equity of FTX Ventures Ltd is owned by Paper Bird Inc."
Elizabeth:
- API integrated
- Multiple Languages
- Strong Communtiy of Developers
- Open Source Project
- Immutable 100% permissionles - no approvals necessary at all
- Make it more decentralized
mentat:
- everyone who registers can mint
- selfminting project