GET A GRIP Profile picture
Mar 6 19 tweets 4 min read
#THREAD

Isabel Oakeshott & Matt Hancock: not only does betraying a confidential source damage journalism, it is also a threat to public health.

Oakeshott's claims about leaking the WhatsApp messages in the name of 'public interest' are highly suspect.

theconversation.com/oakeshott-and-…
Many scandals - including #Watergate & the MP's expenses scandal - help us to understand the vital importance of preserving source confidentiality.

These & m any others would have seen the light of day if the original source had not trusted guarantees of anonymity.
What, then, do we make of the decision by journalist Isabel Oakeshott to present the Telegraph with the complete cache of more than 100,000 WhatsApp messages confidentially given to her by Matt Hancock, for which she signed a non-disclosure agreement?
Interviewed on the @BBC, Oakeshott claimed an “overwhelming national interest” in breaching journalism's golden rule. “Millions… were adversely affected by the catastrophic decision to lockdown this country repeatedly on the flimsiest of evidence, often for political reasons.”
There are three reasons for casting severe doubt on Oakeshott's stated rationale.

First, she spent a year collaborating with Hancock on a book that was published three months ago. Since she had access to his messages at least 15 months ago, why did she wait so long?
Oakeshott said that the cache of messages represented more than 2.3 million words and that the book she and Hancock were collaborating on was twice as long as the average political memoir. So her claim appears to be that she had simply not had time to do so.
Second, she deliberately chose the highly partisan Boris Johnson & Tory-supporting billionaire-owned Telegraph for her exclusive, a paper which is known, as is Oakeshott herself, for its profound editorial hostility to – and partisan coverage of – the scale of lockdown measures.
It would surely have been more responsible, having decided to break an agreement of confidentiality on the grounds of public interest, to do so via a non-partisan broadcaster or to make the messages available online for everyone to make their own judgment.
Third, a full public inquiry into the pandemic has been established. Led by Baroness Hallett, its remit is designed precisely to examine responses to the pandemic both by health authorities and by the government.
A genuine public interest response to any concerns raised by Hancock’s messages would surely be to hand them over to that inquiry where they could be properly contextualised and analysed, rather than allow them to be selectively quoted in pursuit of a journalistic agenda.
Instead, we are now seeing cherrypicked messages published piecemeal to further support the Telegraph’s own editorial position.

Crucially, they are being published without any input from the scientific community about its expert advice on the urgent need for intervention.
Rather than serving the public interest, these revelations are more likely to cause longer-term damage both to public health and to journalism.
Selective publication of Hancock’s messages has successfully raised doubts about the wisdom and effectiveness of government lockdown measures without any counterarguments from medical experts or scientists.
Should we be exposed to another full-scale public health crisis which requires government action on the advice of those experts, we will surely have less faith in any restrictions imposed by politicians.
Such resistance would no doubt delight the libertarians, but could have dire consequences for public health and safety.

But the damage to journalism could be even greater.
Next time someone discovers corruption or wrongdoing at the highest level and wants to blow the whistle on, say, a Govt Minister or wealthy industrialist at significant personal risk to themselves, will they be quite so ready to trust a journalist’s promise of confidentiality?
At the very least, Isabel Oakeshott’s apparent readiness to betray her source – whatever her stated justification – is likely to generate even more cynicism about an industry that already struggles to command public confidence.
We can be fairly confident that any whistleblower will stay very clear of Oakeshott who – we should not forget – has form in giving up sources in the Chris Huhne-Vicky Pryce affair which ended in the pair both being jailed for perverting the course of justice.
But high-profile incidents like these will surely make it less likely that such public-spirited individuals will be prepared to risk their own livelihood in the public interest. The only beneficiaries will be the rich and powerful who will continue to escape proper scrutiny.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP

GET A GRIP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

Mar 8
What @GaryLineker actually said was "language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s".

This demonstrably true & accurate.

@BBCNews & the entire right-wing media have willfully misrepresented this as "comparing new UK asylum policy to Nazi Germany". Image
So @GaryLineker compared Tory MP's immigration RHETORIC to Nazi rhetoric: Braverman's "invasion" rhetoric, use of antisemitic tropes, & demonisation of 'Lefty lawyers' IS almost identical to Nazi rhetoric, & the barbaric #Rwanda Plan IS very similar to the Nazis' Madagascar Plan. ImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Mar 7
Elon Musk is shit-spouting live now: event.webcasts.com/viewer/event.j…
"Twitter is a forum for citizen journalism. What's the bedrock of a functioning democracy? Free-speech & a level playing field." - Musk

A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD! 🤣 Image
First time I've listened to Musk speak - & probably the last. Imho, he comes across as an inarticulate, incoherent, infantile mumbling waffler. He thinks Twitter can deliver "truth with the least amount of error". What an idiot! I could say "Musk is a lizard" - is that TRUTH?🤣
Read 8 tweets
Mar 7
John McDonnell asks Suella Braverman to tone down her “inflammatory language” as it is putting asylum seekers, & the people who represent them, at risk.

Irresponsible extremist Braverman completely ignores his important request concerning her dangerous & divisive rhetoric.
Patrick Grady asks Braverman if she's ever met anyone who came to the UK on a small boat to ask about their hopes for the future, or look them in the eye & say they are not welcome.

Braverman completely ignores his question & says the bill provides a pragmatic solution. Image
Tommy Sheppard asks Braverman to confirm that it is the Govt’s intention to provoke exclusion from the Council of Europe (which oversees the ECHR) & says the bill is “vile & shameful”.

Braverman ignores the ECHR question & makes the absurd claim that the bill is 'compassionate'. Image
Read 16 tweets
Mar 7
On Monday night, Rishi Sunak argued that his new barbaric immigration bill would “take back control of our borders, once & for all”.

This vague, flexible, yet highly effective slogan was formulated nearly a decade ago, by short-sighted Dominic Cummings.

theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/m…
In 2014, Cummings - who was to become Vote Leave’s campaign director - conducted some focus groups to assess attitudes to a possible IN/OUT Referendum from floating voters. The analysis he produced was never published, but Jason Farrell obtained a copy.

ukandeu.ac.uk/why-take-back-…
Quotes from the pre-#EUReferendum focus groups:

“If Cameron’s so weak that he can’t get control of immigration, then I’m OUT”

“If we leave the EU we'll save a fortune & we can spend that on the #NHS or TAX CUTS”

“We’ve lost control, because of Europe.”

Read 4 tweets
Mar 7
#THREAD

Because of DECADES of misleading & hysterical front pages, divisive political rhetoric, & polarising clickbait TV/radio discussions about immigration, many voters misunderstand the differences between refugees, asylum seekers, migrants, & expats.

Image
A REFUGEE is a person who has fled their own country because they are at risk of serious human rights violations & persecution there. The risks to their safety & life were so great that they felt they had no choice but to leave. Refugees have a right to international protection.
An ASYLUM SEEKER is someone fleeing their own country because they are at great risk, but who hasn’t yet been legally recognised as a REFUGEE & is awaiting a decision on their asylum claim. There's no obligation on refugees to seek refuge in the first safe country they come to.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 7
#Britain HAS been 'invaded' & 'taken over' by dangerous 'aliens' intent on destroying Britain. But not by asylum seekers, refugees, or migrants - by toxic billionaires Rupert Murdoch & Jonathan Harmsworth, & Tory extremists.🙋‍♂️🙋‍♂️🙋‍♂️🇬🇧

#EnoughIsEnough #StopThePressBarons #Leveson2 Image
Since #Brexit, the UK Govt has been brazen about bringing in Koch-funded extremists from a global network of free-market 'think tanks' to shape Govt policy, generate divisive culture war headlines, & push Britain further to the right than ever before.

The Nazis' political strategy was to make alliances with the rich, & divide voters by using #propaganda to scapegoat minorities & vilify political opponents, thus securing just enough votes to become the Govt. Just 29% of the electorate voted Tory in 2019.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(