Today, we take a look at the "merchants of #ambiguity"
Their overarching goal is to create the perception that scientific issues are either eternally #unresolved or that #alternative interpretations are just as plausible or likely.
Why are we #polite? How can our social expectations be used against us? Why is framing #legitimate scientific criticism as a #personal attack a tactic that works?
Our brains generalize & try to avoid #uncertainty, yet dealing with uncertainty is part of the scientific process. How can manipulators #exploit this rift between scientific practice and our preference?
5/
Third, we look at a certain breed of back-to-nature #zealots.
We humans value nature for many beautiful reasons, yet how can this makes us #susceptible to anti-scientific theories and false #appeals from manipulators?
6/
Fourth, the obnoxious faux-persecuted #truthtellers.
We have a soft spot for the #underdog, and casting suspicions against an "establishment, mainstream or elite" narrative is a great #marketing trick for manipulators. But why is this tactic problematic for discourse?
7/
Fifths, we question the counterfeit #freedom fighters.
We humans value our freedom and react badly on perceived #repressions. But what if our reactance can be cultivated and #weaponized all too easily by manipulators?
Whataboutisms appeal to our sense of #fairness and consistency. How can they be abused by manipulators to #discredit, sabotage or #divert conversations?
9/
If you are tired, like most of us, from being manipulated, please take a look at my article.
You can build upon, modify, use it as you please.
If you do, please reference the source
11/
I hope these resources help us all to make sense of our chaotic online environment, #protect us against being #manipulated, improve our media #literacy, and renew our #commitment to truth and intellectual rigor.
Please share and let me know your thoughts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This chapter dives into the ecological and molecular details underlying the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2.
It explains the extraordinary biology of bats, their unique immune systems, and their role as reservoirs for diverse coronaviruses, emphasizing the complex ...
... social structures and behaviors of bat species that facilitate viral recombination.
It describes how mosaic genomes like SARS-CoV-2’s could only have emerged through natural evolutionary processes within diverse bat populations and intermediate hosts.
2/4
The chapter stresses that no laboratory could have artificially created the complex genome of SARS-CoV-2 given current scientific capabilities
Ignoring real natural risks while focusing on evidence-free lab leak theories distracts from necessary pandemic prevention efforts
I gave a long interview to @BenjaminMateus7 about my book Lab Leak Fever and the politics surrounding the lab leak controversy.
Benjamin did a great job editing for conciseness and prompting some pretty deep questions
Some highlights in thread ⬇️
1/
"My account doesn’t rely on unverifiable Chinese sources. That independence is important politically, since both China & US have advanced self-serving narratives
From my vantage point in Switzerland, I aimed to cut through this geopolitical tug-of-war and focus on the evidence."
"My guiding principle has been clear: “To all defenders of an evidence-based worldview”—the dedication in my book.
Evidence, not speculation, not deference to elites, not blind trust in science, but reasoned, evidence-based inquiry."
The anti-vaccine movement became a juggernaut during COVID-19 by exploiting people's anxieties & profiting from their fears
Because emotional manipulation is politically valuable, republicans soon merged with the ideology
Unfortunately, that caused over 200k Americans to die
2/
... just during the delta wave alone.
Given estimates of 1,4 million excess deaths since 2020, half of it after vaccines became available, the odds are that vaccine-preventable death toll was even higher.
A huge political liability for Republicans if voters woke up to that.
3/
I don't know, but I feel like the cool kids don't get sucked into magical worldviews and waste their time live-action roleplaying as "investigators" in trite conspiracy myths.
Which makes all of those in the media who fall for them, over and over again, kinda embarassing?
There is no version of the lab leak idea that does not assume conspiratorial elements, given the evidence we have today.
There is no lab leak "theory" in the first place, just innuendo and magical thinking with mutual contradictory ideas that can not explain available evidence
Given the overwhelming evidence for a zoonotic origin, the scientific case is long clear.
What remains of the lab leak is a zombie idea, a myth kept alive by, sorry to say, mostly science deniers, activists, media manipulators and too many suckers that keep amplifying it.
During the election season, discourse manipulators and influence campaigns work overtime to mislead citizens about scientific topics.
Here are 18 common tactics explained, why it works, and why you should guard yourself against it.
A 🧵
1/
First up are the merchants of doubt
They use an array of manipulation techniques to denounce experts with various smear tactics, deny a scientific consensus exists, and deceive the public with irrelevant stories.
They distort scientific arguments by turning them into partisan fights, discredit proponents of an evidence-based worldview & dismiss the scientific method with appeals to intuition
Conspiracy theorists are shocked to learn that a science blogger writing about the bat origins of SARS-CoV-2 visits field sampling expeditions to interview bat researchers 😅
Good journalistic practice must be a nefarious plot 🤣
A niche 🧵 about conspiratorial ideation
1/
Yesterday, I posted the above fotos to explain that my writing is based on expert interviews, personal research experience, scientific analysis and of course legwork.
Conspiracy theorists have claimed since 2022 that I must be a "paid" shill; from China, Biden, Fauci or EHA
2/
For them, the idea that somebody could keep speaking up for science and scientists because he believes it is the right thing (& despite their hardest efforts to bully me out of the conversation with harassments), is unthinkable.