Nemat Shafik - @Columbia Prez only has 1 well-cited publication in her life, in Oxford Econ Papers 1994.
This paper is lifted almost entirely from a 1992 report coauthored with consultant not credited in the publication.
This is wholesale intellectual theft, not subtle plagiarism
This paper is lifted almost entirely from a 1992 report coauthored with consultant not credited in the publication.
This is wholesale intellectual theft, not subtle plagiarism
This is not a close call. Table 1s are the same. Fig 1s are the same. Massive overlap in text.
She stole the junior author's intellectual property and simply removed his name from published version.
If he contributed enough to be an author in 1992, how can she delete him in 94?
She stole the junior author's intellectual property and simply removed his name from published version.
If he contributed enough to be an author in 1992, how can she delete him in 94?
I'm an academic, and this is NOT okay to do. You cannot remove an author and claim intellectual property for yourself.
When a grad student tried this, we referred him to Dean for disciplinary hearings.
And this is worse because of power imbalance - she removed a *junior* person
When a grad student tried this, we referred him to Dean for disciplinary hearings.
And this is worse because of power imbalance - she removed a *junior* person
The stolen paper has been cited 2395 times.
Her next most cited paper: 115 cites - not very presidential.
This is the *only* publication of note in her portfolio.
You'll find both the coauthored report and the OEP pub at this link - check for yourself
scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&…
Her next most cited paper: 115 cites - not very presidential.
This is the *only* publication of note in her portfolio.
You'll find both the coauthored report and the OEP pub at this link - check for yourself
scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&…
The journal should investigate this. here are the names of the editorial board members. Would appreciate it if folks can tag or email them this thread:
https://twitter.com/mushfiq_econ/status/1783713751809527912
The other author is thanked in a footnote in OEP for their "research assistance" This in some ways is even worse. You are now undermining them even further in their authorship contribution to the earlier policy report - a background paper for the WDR.
https://twitter.com/mushfiq_econ/status/1783845378820812827
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
