"In the Panel’s view this test has assumed too much weight in determining the valuation."
2/
1. A re-evaluation of the employers’ attitude to risk, which would result in a re-evaluation of the reliance on the sponsor covenant.
3/
3. Ensuring fairness and equality between generations of scheme members by smoothing future service contributions.
4/
5/
This compares with:
- 26% - current rate
- 36.6% from April 2020 which is proposed by USS, based on the valuation as it stands
6/
"We believe that our constructive and practical proposals for adjustments to the valuation can be implemented quickly and act as the cornerstone for a negotiated settlement."
"We welcome the JEP’s proposal that the valuation should be adjusted and are also encouraged that the panel now wishes to look in detail at alternative methods for future valuations."
"This first report is a significant landmark in our ongoing campaign to defend members’ pensions."
“We are pleased to receive the Joint Expert Panel’s independent examination of the USS valuation processes and assumptions. We hope that it will create the space for UCU and UUK to find common ground to conclude the 2017 valuation."
"Unless and until an alternative has been agreed, consulted upon, and implemented, cost sharing remains the default process for addressing the regulatory and legal obligations of the 2017 valuation."
uss.co.uk/how-uss-is-run…