Profile picture
Nicolas Lamp @nicolas_lamp
, 7 tweets, 3 min read Read on Twitter
My post on why WTO Members should bring pure non-violation claims against national security measures is now up on the IELP blog. Short version: you can't lose, it should be fast(er), nobody gets upset, you preserve the WTO, and you get what really matters: worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2018/…
Thanks to @snlester for posting it and to @JAHillmanGULaw for encouraging me to write it. Previous twitter discussions on this issues are here and here
1. The complainant can’t lose
2. The complainant should get a ruling fast
3. The complainant doesn’t upset anyone
4. The complainant preserves the rules-based trading system
5. The complaint focuses on what really matters
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Nicolas Lamp
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!