There is nothing politically intelligent in handing an anti-Semite the large, well-publicized @munkdebate platform. Here’s a research article highlighting Bannon‘s anti-Semitism—yes, his #whitesupremacy is so obvious that it appears in an article title. jstor.org/stable/10.2979…
Let me elaborate some points where you go wildly wrong, @CBCSunday. Michael Enright, you irresponsibly minimize the reach and effect that Bannon has strategically built for his brand of anti-Semitism and #whitesupremacy. 2/
Bannon has constructed an international network of anti-Semites and #whitesupremacists. You are dead wrong when you say, "That's an awful lot of social damage to be caused by the mutterings of a lone, right-wing American gas bag." 3/
You talk about caring for Canadian #democracy & suggest that handing Bannon the huge platform of @munkdebate is somehow democratic. That's utterly absurd. Cdn democracy means letting all with a stake in it speak, vote, organize. Bannon has no stake whatsoever in Cdn democracy. 4/
In other words, Cdn democracy doesn't owe Bannon any right to be invited to speak. Especially not on a well-publicized platform like @munkdebate. You quote George Orwell and seem sure he would have defended someone like Bannon's appearance. I'm pretty certain he wouldn't. 5/
Orwell adamantly wrote against #nationalism--by which he meant not just what we call nationalism in everyday parlance but all political & religious ideas that pose one's group as superior to another. Orwell wrote against all that Bannon stands for. 6/ orwell.ru/library/essays…
Michael Enright, you concede that Bannon "does represent a school of thought, a vigorous and dangerous mindset that, if left to grow in darkness like mushrooms." Yes, you are right, we can't let Bannon et al.'s #fascist organizing grow. 7/
But, @CBCSunday, we cannot counter #whitesupremacist organizing by giving it a platform from which it can further recruit. For that is what @munkdebate has become. Let's go back to Orwell, whom you seem to admire. Orwell did not invite #fascists to come and talk to the people. 8/
Orwell put his body on the line fighting against #fascism in Spain. @CBCSunday, if you can see the danger of Bannon's political thought and organizing, why are you not putting yourself on the line in countering it? Why are you instead wanting us to invite #fascist thought? 9/
Let's trace the self-alleged non-political cabal at play here. A cabal trying to change current principles of gender-affirmative care for trans youth. While conducting no original research of their own.
May I introduce, Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM). 1/
Mostly they lobby for "evidence-informed healthcare" for "children, adolescents, and young adults with gender dysphoria."
If you believe a society with that narrow a focus doesn't have very particular political goals, you must be freshly born. 2/
They made a bibliography to show that evidence for gender dysphoria treatments is "of very low quality" and that they are very concerned for gender-dysphoric youth.
They filed an amicus brief to challenge WPATH on mastectomy for adolescents.
This part of #ColinWright's interview went on for quite a bit: he made his own example of not landing a TT job evidence for how rotten he thinks academia is. But he didn't mention once that his supervisor & co-author was a fraudster & that those co-retractions dragged him down.
“'Due to legal concerns (Pruitt obtaining lawyers) I have been advised not to issue any comments on this until the investigation surrounding Dr. Pruitt has finished,' #ColinWright, who co-authored several papers with Pruitt, tells ScienceInsider."
#JesseSingal, true to form, keeps hammering his list of requested corrections on all doors.
Do others remember when he copied his lawyer in an email and said it was certainly not a legal threat? Now he says someone saying corrections might appear “Soon…” is “ominous.” 🙃
So no, dear outraged Jesse, it is not “profound sloppiness” and it does not “exhibit complete unfamiliarity” when one repeats what is widely established in the accompanying research and discussion.
#ColinWright, #Quillette editor: "Being trans is just a state of mind. . .you can't empirically verify it in any way."
I know we didn't really need any more confirmation. But here it is.
When asked about his previous identification as a progressive, this is how he defines it: "I was pro the gay rights movement, and yeah, for sure."
Yep. Progressive. When you support legal and political changes that have just happened and without any of your participation.
#ColinWright about non-binary identity: "It's common but I still don't think people know what they're talking about when they say it. . .Just ask anyone of this ideology about what is a woman, and you just get insanity back."
Then he says "insanity" at least three more times.
"The same evolutionary & biological processes that. . .result in a shorter average lifespan for men than women also contribute to the sex differences in economic outcomes (e.g., annual income) & political participation." #Quillette authors
I'm reading this Shrier piece--follow Merkin's link if you're curious--and an obvious pattern is this.
#AbigailShrier reports with benevolence and understanding on these children's disabilities and mental health struggles UNLESS it's gender dysphoria.
She has detailed paragraphs to build good will from readers based on how supportive she is (and the parents she portrays are) in relation to a child's or teenager's autism, eating disorder, suicidal ideation, self-harm, insomnia, anxiety, depression, PTSD.