1. Liability
2. In most cases (electives are a counter-example), the doctor has a product (the procedure) the patient needs
These do not hold true in the technology field. 3/n
1. There doesn't seem to be meaningful liability for failing to protect data (or the user)
2. You have something the user wants, not needs (in most cases).
The dynamic creates a perverse incentive to downplay risk, neutering the concept of informed consent 4/n
1. Educate users - we use too many services and nobody reads ToS (or the multitude of updates)
2. "Make them pay" - okay, but who are them? Are the fines meaningful? Do fines help the user or just the government?
6/n