,
3 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
We see, in the weight of that fairly nonspecific denial, the capital Peter Carr and the SCO have built up through twenty months of generally declining to speak about investigative matters.
I asked if the wording of the Special Counsel’s statement is meant to exclude statements, testimony or documents obtained in the first instance by another DOJ component (like SDNY).
“I don’t have any additional information beyond our statement at this time,” Peter Carr says.
“I don’t have any additional information beyond our statement at this time,” Peter Carr says.
These are the two key paragraphs of the BF story that the SCO is disputing, as I read their statement. Both say that the SCO obtained its confirmation directly from Cohen, but they don’t say that SCO obtained the other evidence in the first instance. bzfd.it/2Hkk8fb
