,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Think back to that motion on extending Article 50. The subtle shift of language on the long extension part that meant she returned, less than a week later and went: "What long extension? I didn't say that." And now read this again.
She won't stand in the way of a 'new approach'. She 'hears what you are saying'. On an unrelated matter, she's 'prepared to leave this job earlier than I intended". But not, of course, offer any specificity around it.
She's not going anywhere until they go in number 10 and prise her out.
