, 18 tweets, 9 min read Read on Twitter
1/ Day 6 of #NATO7for70 to commemorate 70 years of @NATO!

The sixth installment is "September 12: NATO Invokes Article 5"
2/ While Article 5 – The North Atlantic Treaty’s mutual defense clause – is the cornerstone of the alliance, by the year 2001 it had never been invoked.
3/ That changed when the United States was attacked by the Al Qaeda organization (led by Osama bin Laden) on September 11, 2001
4/ With the attacks taking place in North America (New York City, Washington D.C., and Pennsylvania), one key condition seemed to be met for Article 5
5/ By the morning of September 12, US National Security Advisor @CondoleezzaRice was making phone calls to her counterparts in the various @NATO capitals
6/ According to Daniel Fried, now of the @AtlanticCouncil but with the National Security Council at the time, Rice told a French official “We need this”

The "This" was @NATO agreeing that the attack met Article 5 conditions
7/ You see, here is how Article 5 works

- Step 1: A member calls for Article 5 to be invoked

- Step 2: @NATO members meet to determine if the attack does fall under Article 5

- Step 3: If "yes", then actions are chosen

- Step 4: Each member decides to take the action or not
8/ After Rice made those call, the North Atlantic Council -- the primary political decision body of @NATO -- met.

This body is comprised of the "Permanent Representatives to NATO" (i.e. the NATO ambassadors).
9/ On September 12, 2001, the 🇺🇸permanent representative to NATO was @RNicholasBurns
10/ The body unanimously agreed to *conditionally* say "yes, the attack did meet Article 5 conditions".

Following that vote, then @NATO Secretary General George Robertson informed United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
11/ But that was only the beginning of the "Article 5 process".

The invocation was "conditional" because it had to be determined that the attacks did, indeed, come from abroad.

Until then, the invocation, while meaningful, was largely symbolic.
12/ Specifically, the ambassadors voted on September 12 to approve the following statement (nato.int/cps/en/natoliv…):
13/ The official determination that the attack came from abroad was made on October 4.

Here is the statement by Robertson on that day:
14/ While the statement says 8 measures, the most meaningful was the authorization of operation "Eagle Assist"
15/ The mission lasted from mid-October 2001 to mid-May 2002.

It entailed seven @Nato AWACS radar aircraft patrolling 🇺🇸airspace.

13 of 19 @Nato countries participated, involving 830 crew members & 360 flights
16/ EVENTUALLY, this would pave the way for NATO’s involvement in Afghanistan, through the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).
17/ But it should be made clear that ISAF was a @UN mission eventually led by @NATO, not a @NATO mission (and definitely not an Article 5 mission).
18/ So that’s the story of how @NATO invoked Article 5 for the only time

A final note: it is interesting that none of @NATO’s major military missions (Kosovo, Afghanistan, or Libya in 2011) were Article 5 missions. Makes one ponder the actual value of Article 5 🤔

(end)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Paul Poast
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!