,
4 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Here's what's fascinating -- the reporting of the WSJ, Washington Post, New York Times, Mother Jones, CNN did not produce the most damaging stories on Mike Flynn.
It was the reporting of Chuck Ross at The Daily Caller that was the most damaging.
It was the reporting of Chuck Ross at The Daily Caller that was the most damaging.
To be clear, I'm not accusing Ross of anything improper. He's a reporter. He should be judged on whether his stories are factually accurate or not. Period.
I'm simply reminding everyone which reports harmed Mike Flynn the most.
h/t @codyave
I'm simply reminding everyone which reports harmed Mike Flynn the most.
h/t @codyave
I'm curious who Chuck Ross' source(s) were because he (they) delivered the dagger to Flynn.
Also, keep in mind: Ross was also the reporter who first identified Stefan Halper.
Same source(s)?
Also, keep in mind: Ross was also the reporter who first identified Stefan Halper.
Same source(s)?
He's not wrong.
