,
3 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
The House should get the discovery that courts won’t allow private plaintiffs:
subpoena all executive branch documents relevant to Trump’s travel ban.
Then go back to court to show that it is a Muslim travel ban and unconstitutional.
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/t… via @NBCNews
subpoena all executive branch documents relevant to Trump’s travel ban.
Then go back to court to show that it is a Muslim travel ban and unconstitutional.
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/t… via @NBCNews
@NBCNews Country specific boycotts and travel restrictions are often thinly veiled attacks on a religion when the government of the targeted country is predominantly one religion.
U.S. government documents showing the motive behind Trump’s travel ban will show it to be unconstitutional.
U.S. government documents showing the motive behind Trump’s travel ban will show it to be unconstitutional.
@NBCNews The argument that Trump’s country specific travel ban is not an attack on Muslims because of terrorism is as plausible as the argument that BDS targeting Israel because of the Middle East conflict is not anti-Semitic.
Complete BS.
The courts should strike down the travel ban.
Complete BS.
The courts should strike down the travel ban.
