The hacks that built your MVP will likely prove unsustainable as you graduate to international scale and tight SLAs. /3
In the best scenario, the founder in question recognizes that they aren’t in the right spot and honest dialogue can be had. If so, consider yourself lucky and think about how to harness this person’s talents for the good of the startup. /5
In the case of a disagreement about the state of affairs, a useful exercise is to have each person make the other’s case. Hopefully, this act of empathy helps the partners better understand the frustrations and motivations. /6
In the event there is co-founder friction, and no 3rd co-founder to help add perspective, start by talking to informal advisors and work your way towards your investors. It’s better to first chat with your VC’s who most likely won’t lead the next round. /7
Unless there are unhealthy personality conflicts, the founder who is not scaling can almost certainly continue to add value. Work together to try and determine the person’s “superpower” and how to apply it to new challenges at the startup. /8
If the founder in question is technically brilliant, but not able to lead a large engineering org, putting that person in charge of a team working on some smaller new initiative can be a better use of their talents. /10
Often a more commercial co-founder can be a very impactful commercial “pioneer”, mining a new opportunity, establishing new channels and recruiting more seasoned execs as new line of business matures. /12