,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Funny that the SC did not rule for Dahi Handi, let the Govindas come if there is a safety issue.
For Sabarimala, SC didn't say let a devout Kerala Hindu woman come.
Since the mai-baap courts wants to "fix" and "civilize" Hindus. And only Hindus.
For Sabarimala, SC didn't say let a devout Kerala Hindu woman come.
Since the mai-baap courts wants to "fix" and "civilize" Hindus. And only Hindus.
The entire PIL system is fraudulent. It exists so that the entrenched FCRA-NGO ecosystem can have a veto power on Indian democracy. It makes no sense for the Supreme Court to hear a direct petition. Even less sense from appellants with no locus standii.
HC judgement on PIL say the appellant "has also not satisfactorily established his credentials as a person who has a history of espousing such causes before superior courts in our country."
In other words, your PIL is not valid since you're not part of the ecosystem. 😏
In other words, your PIL is not valid since you're not part of the ecosystem. 😏
