, 3 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Here's the great mystery: Why didn't DoC back in 2018 cite the purposes articulated at pp. 5-8 of the Exec. Order, instead of the absurd VRA fiction, as justifications for adding the question to the census--something the Court probably would have upheld?

big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2…
Just to be clear: I don't think these justifications *should* have worked, because Breyer's dissent is 100% correct. But they would have had a much better shot going with them--and in hindsight almost certainly would have prevailed.
@_justinlevitt_ has some very intriguing and plausible theories about why perhaps Commerce didn't rely upon the E.O. rationales sooner.

electionlawblog.org/?p=106208

@rickhasen
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Marty Lederman
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!