I was interested because a few years back I hired the firm that named Starbucks to help me name a company.
Her approach to naming at her firm @eatmywords feels like an intense copywriting session where she writes one headline that gets used forever
She then blows out that simple philosophy with more detail using what she calls the SMILE/SCRATCH test:
- Suggestive: evokes something about the brand
- Meaningful: resonates w audience
- Imagery: visually evocative
- Legs: Lends itself to extended mileage
- Emotional: moves people
- Spelling challenged
- Copycat: similar to competitors names
- Restrictive: limit future growth
- Annoying: frustrate customers
- Tame
- Curse of knowledge: makes sense only to insiders
- Hard to pronounce
Good names make you smile. Some examples from the book
- Gringo Lingo (a school teaching Spanish)
- Fat Bastard Wine
- Firetalker Public Relations
- The B-school story about the Chevy NOVA not selling in Spain is pure fiction
- Owning your brand name URL is not a good goal- just add a word and focus on writing a great name
- Naming by committee and naming via drinking wine are both dumb