,
4 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
A little perspective on what is going on in California with its Fair Pay for Play Act.
It's a good thing for those who want college athletes to receive more compensation.
But law would go into effect in 2023.
NCAA has group currently working on ways to possibly compensate for NIL
It's a good thing for those who want college athletes to receive more compensation.
But law would go into effect in 2023.
NCAA has group currently working on ways to possibly compensate for NIL
The California law is significant as a way of increasing pressure on the NCAA to make changes. Legal challenges, political pressure and public sentiment is mounting.
But there is a good chance the NCAA will change its rules to accommodate FPTP before there is ever a standoff.
But there is a good chance the NCAA will change its rules to accommodate FPTP before there is ever a standoff.
We'll get a far better idea of what the future is on California FPTP Act when the NCAA comes forward with the results of the working group on name, image and likeness either later this year or early next.
The NCAA does have a good recent history of reading the tea leaves and acting on its own before rules can be hoisted upon it.
Full cost of attendance was a good example. Before judge ruled it had to be allowed (not required) as compensation to athletes, NCAA (P5) implemented it
Full cost of attendance was a good example. Before judge ruled it had to be allowed (not required) as compensation to athletes, NCAA (P5) implemented it
