1) that doesn't go to the PM's purpose,
2) in any event, it's not academic. Parlt may want further legislation, debates, questions, scrutiny.
Pannick: not that we know of.
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqHxrAWwAIKikN.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqKboEW4AAGLLB.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqLvtrXYAEeIJa.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqLvtsXYAAZ0md.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqOFRtWwAA4OzF.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqOFRsWkAAzPHa.png)
Lord Pannick, for Gina Miller: we put the case in both ways - unlawfulness arises from both purpose and effect of prorogation.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqPNf5WwAI40D-.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqP-LGWkAEPBRF.png)
publiclawforeveryone.com/2019/09/12/pro…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqRzOIXsAAHesK.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqRzOQWsAE7z9r.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqSaziXYAAteXe.png)
ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/09/02/pau…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqTQjCW4AEkTm7.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqUG-uW4AAGS-V.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqUqBKWsAAZpw5.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqUqBIW4AAp3EV.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqVKAbXkAAiqgj.png)
ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/prorogation-co…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqXlV8WsAAkErh.png)
Pannick: exec is answerable to Parliament in matters of politics, but to the court in matters of law. Confidence is immaterial.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqYyUwXUAEjIx4.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqcxw2XoAAaHIM.png)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEqcxw2WkAA_kJK.png)