Is insulting islamophobic law breaker "Tommy Robinson" still needed by his US funders?
I mean, now that Boris is filling his shoes...
OK, according to the replies I got, he's still needed to make #BoJo look like the "mainstream fascism" "moderate nice guy".
("You did WHAT?"
"My best friend burned the school down!"
"Oh, not that bad then")
Then guess now "Tommy" should be doing excessive, infuriating things.
Does "Far-Right thug Tommy Robinson soaks up the sun in Tenerife with German Islamophobe banned from Britain" (to quote the Mail) counts?
What's next, "Far-Right thug shamelessly robbing UK people from their hard-earned money while funded by US millions"?
So, the brown-haired guy endorsed by RW think tanks with no ethics, fascists friends and backed by the Kremlin who was involved in #VoteLeaveBrokeTheLaw, or the blond guy endorsed by RW think tanks, with no ethics and fascists friends who was involved in #VoteLeaveBrokeTheLaw?
A thread to discover the "Real #ReesMogg" (21/29)
Climate change denier
Funded by oil/gaz/mining companies
Against the people's and the planet's rights/protection
Openly says that Profits Trump Ethics
Friendly to Neo-nazis
Oh, and this.
Surely you knew already that Rees-Mogg took his business to Ireland to preserve his clients from the damaging effects of the Hard Brexit he advocates?
Well, turns out he has very interesting clients.
Your daily reminder that #BoJo playing the islamophobia card on Bannon's advice now, when it's becoming clear that many UK people (incl. his constituency) changed their mind on Brexit &evidence he knew that VL broke the law is out may not be a coincidence.
Althought islamophobia may have been part of Brexit family even before.
Why would Hannan congratulate the chairman of an islamophobic think tank linked to VeteransforBritain that happens to be funded by the think tank funding "T.Robinson" defense&protests?
So, apparently, "getting back sovereignty" means "do what the ERG says".
But what is the ERG?
Hard to know.
This group receives public funds.
Yet it is a private (third-party) organisation
Thus NOT ACCOUNTABLE to the taxpayers funding it (unwillingly). theipsa.org.uk/publications/f…
As a private (third party) organisation, the ERG does not have to publish a list of its +100 members.
Yes, yes, +100 members.
Here is Suella Fernandez -Chairman of ERG/Minister without portfolio stating that.
Who are those people? No way to know. conservativehome.com/highlights/201…
The ERG is supposed to do research.
What kind of research? No way to know either.
Let the public (*funding them*) know " would directly prejudice the commercial interests of the ERG as the content can only otherwise be obtained via a paid subscription". theipsa.org.uk/publications/f…