The White House has been ignoring subpoenas for several months. Will it be different now?
(THREAD)
washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/…
1: Criminal contempt
2: Civil enforcement
3: Inherent contempt
Let's go through these one by one and discuss the viability of each option. First, up criminal contempt.
nbcnews.com/think/opinion/…
Right now the DOJ is the WH legal defense team.
rantt.com/why-barr-is-he…
The first person they used it on was Don McGahn, who refused to testify about WH obstruction of Mueller.
reuters.com/article/us-usa…
This process seems too slow & inadequate to address the urgency of our constitutional crisis.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/house…
And it's only been used a couple of times since it was established by the Supreme Court as legal precedent in the 1821 case of Anderson v. Dunn
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/…
Then they could circumvent the DOJ and send the sergeant-at-arms to detain someone in secure rooms at the Capitol.
reuters.com/article/us-usa…
What's more likely (and probably a smarter strategy) is that Congress can pursue leveraging fines
crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL…
At that point, officials aren't just in contempt of Congress.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
Like threads like this and want to keep them coming? You can support my work here:
paypal.me/kazweida
patreon.com/kazweida