, 21 tweets, 30 min read
Thread on @ucu's strike demands re #USS pensions in their dispute w @USSEmployers. These demands are stated clearly & succinctly in the strike ballot material👇. 1/
@ucu @USSEmployers These demands imply 8% member contributions (rather than the current 9.6%) until *at least* Oct 2021, since that's the earliest feasible point at which contributions can be influenced by a new "valuation ... in which we are able to have faith". 2/
@ucu @USSEmployers GS @DrJoGrady makes clear here👇that @ucu's demands extend to a guarantee of 8% *beyond* Oct 2021 as well👇. 3/
ucu.org.uk/article/10293/…
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady The sweeping blue-highlighted demand in the official dispute letter👇@ucu sent to @USSEmployers also implies no increases in member contributions beyond 8%, beyond as well as until Oct 2021. 4/

ucu.org.uk/article/10143/…
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady As I note in this blog post👇, it would be irresponsible for @USSEmployers to commit to 8% beyond Oct 2021. They will not agree to this. 5/

medium.com/@mikeotsuka/th…
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady .@USSEmployers could, by contrast, responsibly commit to 8% member contributions *until* Oct 2021. As @aechitty1 notes👇, employers have confirmed to @TPRgovuk that this is affordable. 6/
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk .@ucu's HEC meets today. It's likely they will decide to give @USSEmployers the legally required 2 weeks notice of the onset of strikes, starting in mid-November, unless @USSEmployers agrees to meet the balloted demands by then. 7/
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk An obvious response from @USSEmployers will be to offer to lower member contributions from the current 9.6% to 8.8% until Oct 2021, on condition that @ucu calls off strikes. 8/
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk In late August, @USSEmployers had offered 9.1%, on condition of calling off the strike ballot👇. (9.1% was the member rate implied by JEP proposals.) 9/
ussemployers.org.uk/sites/default/…
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk Now that 2/3rds of balloted @USSEmployers universities have met the 50% turnout threshold, the rationale for a further reduction to 8.8% would be that this restores member contributions to the status quo prior to Oct 2019. 10/
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk Would @UCU's HEC agree to put such an 8.8% offer till Oct 2021 to consultative e-ballot of members? 11/
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk Since @UCULeft has a controlling majority of HEC👇, probably not. Rather, they'll insist on 'no detriment', 'no capitulation' 8% beyond as well as until Oct 2021.... 12/
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft ...thereby impaling @ucu members on the 2nd horn of the dilemma I sketch here👇. 13/
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft If, however, more reasonable voices prevail on HEC, then it's likely that members will be given the opportunity, before strikes begin in mid-November, to accept or reject a @USSEmployers offer of full DB at 8.8% till Oct 2021. 14/14
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft While noting that determination of the member/employer split was ultimately up to JNC, JEP proposed 9.1% member, 20.1% @USSEmployers, until 2020 valuation. 1/7
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft That was a fair & reasonable proposal, issued in a report unanimously approved by a panel consisting of equal @ucu & @USSEmployers appointed membership. 2/7
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft What we now have (Option 3) = 9.6% member (+0.5% over JEP), 21.1% employer (+1.0% over JEP), until 2020 valuation. That's a reasonable sharing of the increases over JEP, with employers absorbing twice as much of the increase as members. 3/7
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft In August, @USSEmployers proposed 9.1% member (same as JEP), 21.6% employer (+1.5% over JEP), until 2020 valuation. It would have been reasonable for members to call off the strike ballot to accept this proposal where employers bear 100% of increase over JEP. 4/7
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft If @USSEmployers now propose 8.8% member, 21.9% employer, until 2020 valuation, members would pay 0.3% LESS than what JEP proposed, & employers 1.8% more. 5/7
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft Unless one regards JEP's originally proposed 9.1% member, 20.1% employer contribution split as grossly unfair to members (in spite of the fact that it arose from a report unanimously endorsed by @ucu as well as @USSEmployers appointees)… 6/7
@ucu @USSEmployers @DrJoGrady @aechitty1 @TPRgovuk @UcuLeft …it would be hard to deny that 8.8% member, 21.9% employers, is a fair & reasonable basis for a settlement. 7/7
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Michael Otsuka

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!