I have no idea if this scoop is accurate or if they are setting more traps - I don’t read WaPo and I’m not even going to share the link.
BUT... while *some* have been pumping up expectations of the IG report, I have urged caution.
It was always going to come down to AG Barr...
BUT... while *some* have been pumping up expectations of the IG report, I have urged caution.
It was always going to come down to AG Barr...
In short, our oversight functions don’t have teeth...
It didn’t get this way over night; it’s going to take a long time to get that function back.
There will be facts, it’ll be damning... but don’t expect any teeth.
It didn’t get this way over night; it’s going to take a long time to get that function back.
There will be facts, it’ll be damning... but don’t expect any teeth.
If history is any lesson, expect that the scope will have been beaten down.
... it’s what happened to ICIG!
The ppl they are investigating have lawyers and their lawyers will have worked hard to define/minimize the scope.
IG seems to allow it.
... it’s what happened to ICIG!
The ppl they are investigating have lawyers and their lawyers will have worked hard to define/minimize the scope.
IG seems to allow it.
Again
So... if you want to believe that WaPo is now accurate, then take that story as good news.
It was ALWAYS going to come down to AG Barr!
... beware of those peddling “IG Orgasms”, bc there is ZERO precedent that suggests our oversight roles are back (even tho I hope they are)!
It was ALWAYS going to come down to AG Barr!
... beware of those peddling “IG Orgasms”, bc there is ZERO precedent that suggests our oversight roles are back (even tho I hope they are)!
If he goes Nuclear... that’s great. I just don’t see why anyone would expect such of a thing.
History shows otherwise.
History shows otherwise.
