Theism is entirely JUSTIFIED as a belief. No theist is doing anything wrong epistemically by believing. I defy you to SHOW OTHERWISE.
You are so arrogant as to believe that something YOU don’t accept to be true is therefore UNJUSTIFIED.
But anyone can say that about anything.
You are so arrogant as to believe that something YOU don’t accept to be true is therefore UNJUSTIFIED.
But anyone can say that about anything.
I will use your logic:
I do not accept atheism.
THEREFORE atheism is unjustified.
Q.E.D.
I do not accept atheism.
THEREFORE atheism is unjustified.
Q.E.D.
You might say that theism is not DEMONSTRATED, but that is a VERY different claim to calling it UNJUSTIFIED.
I would dispute the claim it is UNDEMONSTRATED, noting that often
1 atheists misdefine “demonstration"
2 atheists reject cogent demonstrations by acts of will
I would dispute the claim it is UNDEMONSTRATED, noting that often
1 atheists misdefine “demonstration"
2 atheists reject cogent demonstrations by acts of will
The following are true:
1 Theism is entirely epistemically JUSTIFIED
2 No theist NEEDS to have recourse do DEMONSTRATION as the basis of their JUSTIFICATION, and few do
3 Theism is demonstrable and demonstrated, although this isn’t very important
1 Theism is entirely epistemically JUSTIFIED
2 No theist NEEDS to have recourse do DEMONSTRATION as the basis of their JUSTIFICATION, and few do
3 Theism is demonstrable and demonstrated, although this isn’t very important
Here is a passage from Alvin Plantinga that is very illuminating on the question of whether a believer is within his or her epistemic rights. 
