Did some research on this recently, & thought I would toss it out here for any1 interested.
Criticism welcome.
My takeaways:
- Shokin was clearly fired b/c of corruption.
- Shokin's office inexplicably sided WITH Burisma, in anti-corrup. probe.
- I'm EXTREMELY skeptical of Shokin's claim, & there's no evidence to support. Top deputy said was dormant.
- DT's story = nonsensical
Conclusion:
As I see it, if no investigation into Burisma at the time, DT technically committed an impeachable offense.
Based on what I've seen, I do not believe there was an investigation into Burisma at the time, and I dont think my position is a stretch, by any means.