JH: On 28 Jan, I understand you decided not to model what the death rates would be with track & trace model b/c you decided we didn’t have testing capacity?
PV: I don’t know if that’s correct. I can't remember off the top of my head.
JH: Can you tell us why that condition was changed?
PV: I'm not sure I can tell you.
VALLANCE: Well...well...I...I should be clear about what I was trying to say.
#Covid19UK
On 9/4, he rejected claims of two of his chief modellers that no modelling for the consequences of lockdown was done until mid-March?
He doesn’t deny it.
“Acting in a way that does not meet expectations poses a risk that a section of the public will view Govt actions as incompetent or not in the public’s best interests.”
“For what gain?” he asks @mattfrei.
The man with his head in hands is @tomaspueyo whose modelling showed lockdown is vital for combating #coronavirus.
He is much less bullish 6 weeks and 30,000 deaths on.
He is one of the scientists advising the govt about easing the lockdown & sending children back to schools now.
@KirstyWark asks him if SAGE recommended an end to contract tracing on 12 March.
“I can’t remember” he says.
If only SAGE’s kept minutes of their meetings...#Covid19 #COVID
@devisridhar says lifting the #COVID19 lockdown is “pointless” if we do not have infrastructure to detect & trace
But many of the UK's top scientists👇have raised concerns about who is at "the top table". https://t.co/UzessTaqRA