My Authors
Read all threads
THREAD: and that was one of the most idiotic statements ever uttered by him, unless he wrapped Friar Pacioli in copper coil inside s magnet in order to produce limitless electricity.
(1/11) @nglinsman @amlivemon @Halsrethink @bondstrategist @tyillc @mtmalinen @jeuasommenulle
Politicians have mastered the art of "we tax X to invest in Y", egged on by #Thaler aficionados thinking that #Nudge is not lying, but it should be properly called by its name: Bulls**t. None of them ever bothered to unravel the intricacies to make that remotely true. (2/11)
That's because one of the principal functions of money is being FUNGIBLE: the bank note you hold in your hand has infinite potentialities, good and bad, up to its face value limit, irrespective of the way you earned it. It could be stolen or hard earned, it doesn't care.(3/11)
So, having taken care of the fact that ALL liabilities and income finance ALL expenses, be they current or investment, let's chew the bone of what his words REALLY meant: it's all about spending, baby.
(4/11)
By limiting his words to DEBT and specifically the #COVID related binge, #Draghi stole a page from a fellow Roman institution, namely the #Vatican: he granted an Indulgence to any and all debtors in his flock. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence
(5/11)
Thus, every spending program PREDATING the COVID spree gets its "get out of jail free" card and must not be questioned under the True Faith. Moreover, programs started previously get the same treatment. (#GreenNewDeal anyone? #CAP? #Strasbourg? #Alitalia?)(6/11)
But bitter as it may seem, that's not the worst outtake. Just turn the phrase around a bit.
Having debunked that when he says "bad debt" he really means "bad spending", he (wittingly, I'd say) let the cat out of the bag.
Central Banks want to decide on spending. (7/11)
That's an explosive outcome since it is customarily accepted that public spending must undergo voters' acceptance. But like big Prince-Electors of the Holy Roman Empire, the #ECB and other unelected institution have a power deniede voters.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince-el… (8/11)
That's fine, as long as there is a clear separation of powers ensuring that proper political (and by that read "democratic") oversight is present. The indipendent #ECB that decides money supply and repo rates is a noble institution. (9/11)
But as soon as she utters inane words whose sole purpose is to shape WHERE the money goes instead of HOW MUCH money is there, think #ESG, #MIFID and other investment shaping mechanism, the system goes haywire.(10/11)
So, my main question would be: "Unless you work HARD at a level, no-intermediary investment playing field, why do you go on blabbering about "markets", a concept you willfully distorted beyond recognition?"
@amlivemon @galietti82 @macrodesiac_ @DavidBCollum @RudyHavenstein
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Giovanni B. Ponzetto

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!