Or her troubling beliefs on the 14th amendment & civil rights?
Alone w/ her disturbing adherence to strict originalism & her lack of belief in Stare Decisis -- that's a dangerous combination for the rights of so many.
Not only did she sign the ad against choice with other professors at Notre Dame and publicly bstate she found choice barbaric, but in 2016 she helped promote a fake abortion clinic.
Research has shown these "crisis centers" caused distress for women.
Or that she would've supported Governor Pence's law making women who abort, either by miscarriage or procedure, to hold FUNERALS for the "remains".
And her views on Stare Decisis. She doesn't believe in her role now that she should set precedent, but that also charges for her when she gets to the Supreme Court.
As you know, she could use strict originalist beliefs to vote against settled law.
#AmyComeyBarrett has stated she does not fully believe in Stare Decisis.
In her current role she says she is not in the position to challenge it, but as #SCOTUS she says law can be overturned no matter how long standing, if she sees fit.
"Knowledge-Based Trust: Estimating the Trustworthiness of Web Sources"
If @Google is testing this in the SERPS (no evidence that they are now w Dr Oz, Dr Axe, & David Wolfe w/ top 10 placements on health/medical searches), but if so? Shame on them.
There was a mention @Google might looking into scientific consensus to rank sites. I think it would be a terrible signal, but why? Look at these two links
Polyunsaturated fats are highly present in the American diet.
Was only recently they tied the PUFA Omega 6s to serious incidence of disease.
So while the AHA is not wrong - Omegas (3) ARE good the high incidence of Omega 6 in the American Diet is highly inflammatory & not.
But the AHA site does not mention this, they do not even break down the difference. Why? Because the Omega 6 research is fairly new and you DO Need it, but in very small quantities in a 1:1 ratio w Omega 3s.
The American Diet? Usually as high as 13:1 Omega 6s to 3s