What caught my attention was this highly unusual opening clause.
Anything relying on a declarative statement from Priti Patel (of all people) on Human Rights is immediately suspect.
It's important to read these bills with amendments and explanatory notes since this Government tends to obscure things by writing them across documents.
Maybe you think this is appalling but limited? Only Home Office?
This is the famous offending paragraph giving Government operatives the power of life and death over any of us...
So I looked up Nazi Germany.
The power of life and death was reserved for the Führer.
We delegate it to the Environmental Agency.
Churchill would be proud
In Ancient Greece, 700 BC, a bloke called Draco [Δράκων] first wrote down Oral laws.
The laws were written so harshly that draconian is now associated with unjustifiable law, such as this.
So under what very tight language can the state kill on demand?
Hmm what's "section 5"?
Oh that's good.
To prevent disorder.
Or if it's economically beneficial
So basically on any day of the week containing a "Y"?
This is the sort of freedom of operation that Dictators get horny about. It would be impossible to pass in any democracy with a functional constitution.
They'd need things like judicial agreement or eyes of 3 ministers.
Hmm I wonder who does sign this off? Who is "the person"
Dead reader I'm writing as I read this so we're discovering it together.
I feel compelled to remind you this Gov loopreduced the number of HMG doctors required to detain you indefinitely without appeal.
To one
And this how clear Prickly Petal is in defining "the person"
There are a considerable number of hard right supporters of this Gov who look very similar to Trump's ultra right libertarians, with maybe fewer guns. The have a BIG FEAR - the Deep State
We're not yet at person, but list is already so long it's the Mariana Trench of Deep States
Oh now, this is interesting. We seem to have enabled powers beyond those of the SS while not reviewing or amending who can grant them.
You don't know section 30 off by heart? Shame on you dear reader.
Section 30 will test your Sir Humphry powers to the limit.
See u next tweet
So who is it in that long list of authorities that can authorise shoot to kill?
Yep, anyone Prickly Petal says it is.
And who is it who sanctions and controls The Home Secretary, ensuring checks and balances?
You got it.
The Home Secretary herself.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An Open Letter to the Prime Minister, The Right Honourable Boris Johnson MP, on the clarity or lack of #Brexit advice within or supporting his latest campaign.
Subject: The difficulties to overcome for many of us to prepare are insurmountable.
🇬🇧1 @BorisJohnson
Prime Minister,
As a matter of public record, we must point out for you the difference between telling people that they are unprepared and telling them for what they are to prepare.
The latter is usually a prerequisite for the former.
Examples follow:
🇬🇧2
You or your assistants have run three advertising campaigns instructing us to prepare for #Brexit and to take advantage of its opportunities.
If I may, let me deal with both, just in case the details have been "skipped over."
BREXIT NEWS Boris Johnson launches advertising drive warning businesses ‘time is running out’ to prepare for Brexit amid no-deal threat independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi… via @circleboom
Probably, and I'm just guessing. Preparation requires some indication of what they're getting.
A good point. If you wanted to prepare, this is the only way you could do it properly