TLDR. Many if not all Johnson Gov mistakes on #Covid19 are explained by just one thing.
Treating it like Flu.
Trouble is they're still doing that. And it's no more like Flu now than it was in March.
Someone has to remove these negligent idiots...
Thread.
1. Since March I've sent 100s of tweets on one Topic.
UKGov made a huge mistake.
They took a strategy for Pandemic Influenza, applied it but didn't allow for #COVID19 differences.
That's NOT OK once.
But what if they're still doing it.
NOW in October??
If the facts fit⏬
2. Psychology textbooks are FULL of examples of Group think. Invariably we find after the largest disasters in history, the initial errors were small.
For want of a small rubber seal, Challenger was lost.
For want of a radio so was the Bay of Pigs.
Bad decisions compound.
3. We know it was Group Think due diligent civil servants.
These forgotten heroes knew a pandemic might hit us.
They knew in a crisis things could go wrong.
So they created safeguards. No individual, even the PM, could make decisions without cabinet input and science review.
4. The TLDR?
I've counted over 30 serious errors in HMGs approach to #Covid19 eg. Test Track and Trace.
But the civil service planned for that level of mess. So you need to ask, what is the small assumption that broke everything?
THEY ASSUMED A QUICK VACCINE.
AND STILL ARE
5. For pandemic influenza:
✅vaccine is inevitable
✅will come quickly
✅can be made at volume (not as fast as you may think)
✅may be unreliable but will have impact on the famous rate of spread Ro
✅people know what to expect
You may have missed this fifth anniversary. On October 8th, 2015, Vote Leave launched.
I thought I'd take a quick look at its 5-year achievements.
1. Strategy & Plan
Those leading Vote Leave have, in political terms, had an enormous amount of time to figure out a plan that would secure a promising future for the UK outside the EU.
Objectively what will historians conclude?
Was there a plan?
Was it realistic?
It's hard to find any evidence to answer yes to either of those questions.
Compared to the EFTA/ETA model offered in 2016 #Brexit is in its 10-13th iteration (depending on how you count)
With 2.5 months to go, the two architects have no better idea for a settlement than 2016.
An Open Letter to the Prime Minister, The Right Honourable Boris Johnson MP, on the clarity or lack of #Brexit advice within or supporting his latest campaign.
Subject: The difficulties to overcome for many of us to prepare are insurmountable.
🇬🇧1 @BorisJohnson
Prime Minister,
As a matter of public record, we must point out for you the difference between telling people that they are unprepared and telling them for what they are to prepare.
The latter is usually a prerequisite for the former.
Examples follow:
🇬🇧2
You or your assistants have run three advertising campaigns instructing us to prepare for #Brexit and to take advantage of its opportunities.
If I may, let me deal with both, just in case the details have been "skipped over."
BREXIT NEWS Boris Johnson launches advertising drive warning businesses ‘time is running out’ to prepare for Brexit amid no-deal threat independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi… via @circleboom
Probably, and I'm just guessing. Preparation requires some indication of what they're getting.
A good point. If you wanted to prepare, this is the only way you could do it properly
What caught my attention was this highly unusual opening clause.
Anything relying on a declarative statement from Priti Patel (of all people) on Human Rights is immediately suspect.
It's important to read these bills with amendments and explanatory notes since this Government tends to obscure things by writing them across documents.
Maybe you think this is appalling but limited? Only Home Office?