Either lazy journalism means the writer missed Y7-11 have the most cases of any age (>2%) or they were trying to create the impression of a problem that is overhyped
Bias
1/
2/
Relatively few is wrong
Look at @ONS data: you see only 6th Form - 24 even come close to 2%
NB: These @ONS demographics seem to carry bias too
Perhaps the author tried to convey something else & failed
No idea how you would analyse this, but maybe more isolations do occur in students relative to adults who test positive
But this is a symptom of the problem 👇
4/
Educational settings are responsible for a QUARTER of all #COVID19 cases, likely largely because social distancing is neither possible nor practised.
@BBCNews journalists should be examining whether schools are a reservoir of #COVID in the community...
5/ Surely its beneath @bbhuwpym’s department to be complicitsweeping the problem of children driving transmission under the carpet, while other sectors are trashed for a problem that could be planned around?
.@DogLady2020 I just checked back in on the prediction from 21 days ago & the 7 day average is 200 deaths per day
😖
Third time in a row I have been a bit under (181 yesterday, then we had catch up Monday) but a reasonable prediction for 14/11 is 300 - 400 deaths a day
Previous estimates have been based on the 7 day average of cases reported.
Shifting to 7 day average of cases by swab date gives an expected average of 206 deaths/day today - spookily accurate.
WARNING: We don't know the average yet as swab date lags by c. 4 days
3/
We are on day 57 👆
Looking at another measure - the log of cases reported so far 👇 you can see the orange line (deaths by date of death) is higher than the rolling average reported (blue)
This is because fatalities are rising - but note the last 5 days are unreliable