1/ A 🧵 on some #CO2 measurements in my home, car, school *AND* details/instruction on how to use dry ice for DIY estimate of #ventilation rates at your home or as a school project.
2/ Lots of good resources on using #CO2 as a rough measurement of #ventilation rates in your house, car, school, business. I.e. if CO2 < 800 ppm, generally fresher air, better ventilation. If CO2 rises, so does #COVID aerosol risk b/c of poor ventilation.
Serendipitous obs of *really* high CO2 (4000+ ppm) w/ 2 adults/3 kids in car. Then one is #carsick & we crack 2 windows ~1”; CO2 drops immediately to ~750!
Interestingly, drive home had a) much lower CO2 & b) freshly cut tree in car!
4/ ✔️Take-home message - crack windows while driving quickly ventilates the vehicle. If driving w/ someone outside of your household (friend, Uber) recirc & windows dramatically improves air.
Also ... bringing a 6' tree in the car cuts down #CO2! 😁
Surreptitious obs of my child's classroom (2 teachers + 15 kids). Easy to see CO2 build-up during school (+ dips during recess). Time to open more windows! #COVIDCO2
I put several #COVIDCO2 sensors around my home. Expected poor #ventilation, but learned how even worse & slowly dissipates. Highest >2000 ppm when cooking (gas; no external vent).
Placed #COVIDCO2 sensors in lecture and music classrooms at univ. Saw CO2 build-up overnight in two #music practice rooms.
Aha! Students practice late at night when #ventilation is off. Got facilities to extend schedule; no more high CO2!
8/ To get going with your own #CO2 & #COVIDCO2 monitoring, the sensors usually $100-200 each & handheld. The #aranet4 sensors I use are 2" x 2" x 1" (like a small computer mouse & half the weight).
9/ I compared 15 #CO2 sensors from @AranetIoT & found pretty good agreement. Lit for most NDIR sensors say ±50 ppm. Range here at low CO2 was ~100 ppm.
Also varied well together; avg slope ~1, but varied a bit ± 0.03.
Best to take your sensor outside to check it is ~420 ppm!
10/ For a deeper level home study of #CO2 you can measure the air exchange rate (AER). Sufficient AER is ~3-6+ air changes per hour (ACH). Homes usually have 0.2 - 2 ACH. The doc steps through detail on how to achieve. Highlights & obs from my home below. docs.google.com/presentation/d…
11/ My strategy to measure #ventilation rate was to use dry ice (solid #CO2). Cheaply, easily adds high CO2 to a room, them slowly exchanges with outside air & drops back toward ~400 ppm (outside concentration).
This method is fun & my kids enjoyed helping; but be safe (-78C).
12/ I also made a simple calculator to estimate how high the #CO2 concentration will go, based on how much dry ice you add and size of the room. Created for a @UofDenver class, adapted for general use to measure home #ventilation rate. #COVIDCO2 bit.ly/33KO4tC
I recently did 5 air exchange rate calculations when my family was out of the house. I admit I love doing experiments ... it was a fun way to do #scienceathome. Measuring #CO2 exchange would also be easy for a #school project.
14/ You can get a rough idea of air exchange just by watching how fast #CO2 drops back to ~400-500 ppm or can graph to get an air exchange rate (in air changes per hour, ACH); see doc.
My house: between 0.3 and 2.0 ACH, depending on situation (windows, vents, furnace blower).
15/ Here is one way to look at the changes in #ventilation, #COVIDCO2 in my house by looking at how fast #CO2 drops back down.
1) Opening windows + ceiling fans: x7 more (0.3 →2.0 ACH) 2) Furnace blower on: x3 (0.3→ 0.8 ACH) 3) Opening ceiling vent: x2 (0.3→ 0.5 ACH)
16/ LOTS of other resources: links & experts in document (tweet 1) & thread.
The point: Measuring #CO2 is one way to get a feel for #ventilation rate where you are. Examples 👆 show how you may be surprised & ways to improve.
1/ Here's a quick bite (< 2.5 minutes) of overview on infectious respiratory aerosol emissions, #ventilation, and using #CO2 monitors as a tool in the fight against COVID & for healthy indoor air.
2/ I recently gathered several interesting stories from recent CO2 measurements as well as a simple example of how I had fun measuring the ventilation rate in my house.
3/ Measuring #CO2 to estimate ventilation rate is a quick way of approximating the amount of "rebreathed air" (the portion of air you breath that has already been in someone else's lungs).
2/ They explored a variety of respirators and masks. As expected, the collection efficiency of the N95 & surgical masks did very well. Masks with filters next, lowest filtration quality when only single-ply material used.
3/ The "fit factor"/FF (higher = better) is also critical. Look at the difference between the N95 and surgical masks in terms of fit (left).
Also see how much fit factor increased when more tightly fitted (below on right w/ ear loop adjusters to make snug).
1/ More great work by @smogdr & team to test the performance of various kinds of #masks.
The (re)introduce mask "protection factor" (PF) as a fraction of particle mass that makes it through & also evaluate breathability, effect of mask construction, etc. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac…
2/ This is the thread of main points that @SmogDr put together associated with the now-published & #OpenAccess paper.
3/ And if you haven't already played around with the mask-testing data, @SmogDr & team built this interactive site (months ago) to look in detail at results from various masks. jv.colostate.edu/masktesting/
3/ "There is a pressing and urgent need for action. COVID-19 infections and deaths recently reached record levels. The roll-out of vaccines that started out in December rocky and slow is now improving, but it will be months before most of the population is vaccinated."
1/x Just can't shake my disappointment in yesterday's #CDC school opening guidelines: "Operational Strategy for #K12 Schools through Phased Mitigation"
3/ So many lines of thought to follow, but I will direct you to short thread yesterday by @CorsIAQ for a good summary. The gist is simply that the #CDC guidelines leave out some of the most important, obvious help b/c they ignore the airborne component.
2/ "In times when classes were conducted with windows and door closed, the aerosol concentration was reduced by more than 90% within less than 30 min. when running the purifiers (air exchange rate 5.5 ACH). The reduction was homogeneous throughout the room ..."
[note log y-scale]
3/ Figure 3: Highly reproducible reduction in aerosol particle concentration [uCPC] in a closed classroom without air purifiers (blue line) and with 3 or 4 air purifiers operating at speed 3 or 4 (max).