I am amused by anyone on #MedTwitter who thinks I can be easily intimidated. Chile.. first I am Gen X. Then, I have lived through having gas masks distributed in case chemical war happened (when living in an oil compound). Then I have lived in places you hear gunshots routinely.
I experienced a ton of bullying, including (but not limited to) racial, as a child back when teachers told you the problem was you not being tough enough and they were not there to solve “your problems” for you. If a kid stole something, why’d you “let” him?
I have navigated the outspoken WOC in the workplace such that (despite folks who attempt to spread rumors otherwise) I have a perfectly “clean” record. No dark web searches will uncover “dirt” cuz there is none to be found.
Yes, some will resort to manufacturing instead.
While my head has remained attached I have seen MANY others’ head roll. And having been in compliance and an expert fraud and abuse investigations for public sector, including for AG’s office, I take extra precautions to keep my nose clean.
That said, I have seen how much “the rules” are flouted by some yet others get nitpicked and penalized.
So, I am anti-policing behaviors. Anyone who advises to be polite, as well, is not being anti-racist or anti-sexist. “Polite” is subjective and invites biased judgements.
As a child and in early career I internalized the idea that certain things were my own fault.
I know better now.
And I refuse to watch another generation told wrong things or told others’ “control” over them is for their own good.
Most often the issue is that one has stumbled upon something that maps to revenue. Even when “prestige” or “reputation” or “optics” is mentioned it is straight from marketing concepts on “brand.” Companies with strong brand often do not serve all, segment
That’s fine if you are selling smartphones. The problem is when academic medicine defines itself by “brands” as these are often the self appointed leaders on “#equity” - there is an inherent mismatch of the #revenuecycle or market segmentation and stated #DEI goals.
The way #healthcare, on #hospital side, makes 💰 is procedures. “Good” payer mix is considered to be more private insurance. Recall one place I considered in the Bronx (I withdrew my candidacy) was ramping up varicose vein procedures (not maternal health)
This is a super skilled dance by the institution to use “empathy” sounding words, an administrator describing being “hurt”
Yet is invoking the “scary” Black woman stereotype/trope by using “intimidating” as if nursing is not used to patients with knowledge + social media access
You hear empathy talked about. Many administrators are using “tactical empathy” to disarm, give a *feeling* of control or being heard to actually keep control and to win negotiations favorable to selves. It is an FBI interrogation/influence technique.
Yes, I know we have worked hard to get where we are and are regulated/monitored in so many ways it is scary to deviate and take a risk of censure or discipline. It feels like we are vulnerable, not strong.
It is not about being "woke" per se as some people claim. It is about caring about measurable results & caring about human life. If you don't care about such things and are in #healthcare, if #equity is merely a hashtag or for "reputation management", you are part of the problem
I understand some people feel those at the margins can be written off or just are not part of their consciousness, irrelevant. That position of privilege goes away in a pandemic. Those people you may disregard most of the time become highly relevant to everyone's wellbeing.
It is very attractive to break problems into little, manageable parts and to isolate yourself to a silo. Too much of science operates this way. Too many of those rewarded within #STEM go narrow and deep. Then the messiness of the real world is not addressed in solutions.
This was a suicide bombing & terrorism where someone filled an RV with explosives, parked it in front of key infrastructure, while he was inside. They were not initially sure if the "tissue" found was human or not to ID him.
Add the media coverage of Dr. Moore describes her as "complaining" as opposed to "reporting" or "identifying." Then the hospital's response is to describe her as "intimidating" to nurses as "knowledgeable"
The words we use matter. How much caution do we use, with whom, when? What tropes or associations are invoked? How does that populate the "data" in our brains that fill certain "buckets"? Who "complains" or "intimidates" vs "we don't know all the facts"
This is very important. I had been preferably using Black gifs for representation.
The nature of #communication is that how you intend it and how others may receive it will pass through many other filters as well as sources of trauma.
While I have not received any feedback that my gif use is inappropriate one should not wait to be told. Going to be sure to apply an additional lens and filter.
Caution: Some who call themselves #communication “experts” may be about promotion rather than reliable #DEI or results
In particular, when you look at who to trust or emulate on #SciComm or #MedTwitter, take note of who is effective at communicating their point, does not need to delete, can post on important topics with least misinterpretation, while maintaining the broadest audience.
The world (specifically healthcare) is not giving me good feels right now.
And:
I miss my cat
I miss NYC
I want bubble tea
Well, bubble tea has been ordered.
Puritan territory New England does not have the flavors I want at 10:27 p.m. but I realize that at least I do have bubble tea access in the first place.
As much as I now call Boston a village... it isn’t really.