Yes, I know we have worked hard to get where we are and are regulated/monitored in so many ways it is scary to deviate and take a risk of censure or discipline. It feels like we are vulnerable, not strong.
..except at an expert witness again like I was for the AG’s office...
However, I do know that if I were to engage in any kind of action or have an action taken against me, my record is squeaky clean and I have credibility built over two decades
A lot of us get into medical school, thru medical school & into leadership positions
through high standards, often perfectionism
becomes our Achilles’ heel
sometimes we seem powerful
but we live in
fear
(maybe of public controversy tarnishing our reputations)
I get frustrated with the constant battles that I see play out between doctors and nurses
but I do often find that nurses understand the experience of being disempowered
are intentional in having allies/support
doctors come from an individualistic culture, feel alone
Leadership of any kind is often a very lonely experience.
It does entail sacrifice
It is hard to know went to navigate around versus when to take a stand. When to sacrifice the title/role itself. What kind of loneliness to accept?
There often isn’t any single right answer for how to lead or when to make certain sacrifices or not.
What I do know is if your need for achievement is driven by #impostersyndrome as opposed to courage, your ability to be an ethical leader is compromised by your insecurity.
Traditionally physicians were self-employed (outside of the military context) and this created a balance of power with administration.
Nurses were employed but many had the protection of a union.
What was not okay in that paradigm was the way in which nurses & many members of care team were bullied by physicians.
There also was an undervaluing of outside of a hospital care of that was community-based.
As we are shifting the system, I’m seeing less physician courage tho.
Outside of medicine and there was this high profile case, and a dispute over whether @timnitGebru was fired or resigned. What is clear is the irony of departure of an #AI ethics researcher over an AI research paper. These are exactly what leaders face.
Women who get these roles often have more courage than our peers. We disregard labels. We do not respect “boundaries.” We breach the barricade, shatter the glass ceiling. More common in WOC. “Women of color are the biggest professional risk-takers”
But is a WOC allowed to navigate spaces same way? Her communication is constantly scrutinized: “rude”, “intimidating”
Women often not seen as a physician in the first place
Classic sexist responses to women who speak up, holdover from Victorian gender roles: “shut her up”
I post this often as well, but often successful c-suite women need to be “tough” and fit into the “old boys club” & characterize harassment/bullying as something they had enough “grit” to overcome.
So which leaders can invoke images of Knights of the Round Table to fall on his sword? (or sacrifices to not comply with wrongdoing)
Who falls off a glass cliff, is “weak”, she could not cut it” (gif)
How does this affect ability to take an ethical stance?
One of the best sessions on how to be an ethical physician leader was this CMO Academy by the AAPL. Yes, is a pretty non-diverse group in that room, but sometimes when you can remove identity topic and isolate ethics, you can learn really useful things.
I still don’t agree with this @nature article being retracted, cuz, frankly, it is from male mentors that I have learned the most about courageous and ethical leadership. Women, too often are precariously perched under a glass ceiling or on a glass cliff.
Those of you who follow me likely see me posting the same things over & over again.
No leadership class or coach has the answers: not for the changing system, for interplay of identity and leadership.
Who is a leader? How to lead?
It is like trying to solve a Rubik’s cube.
That’s also why I unroll my own threads. I’m iterating on my own thoughts looking at the same things from new perspectives and trying to fit familiar pieces with new ones. Or deconstruct the existing structure to built it differently. How else to dismantle structural inequity?
It is not about being "woke" per se as some people claim. It is about caring about measurable results & caring about human life. If you don't care about such things and are in #healthcare, if #equity is merely a hashtag or for "reputation management", you are part of the problem
I understand some people feel those at the margins can be written off or just are not part of their consciousness, irrelevant. That position of privilege goes away in a pandemic. Those people you may disregard most of the time become highly relevant to everyone's wellbeing.
It is very attractive to break problems into little, manageable parts and to isolate yourself to a silo. Too much of science operates this way. Too many of those rewarded within #STEM go narrow and deep. Then the messiness of the real world is not addressed in solutions.
This was a suicide bombing & terrorism where someone filled an RV with explosives, parked it in front of key infrastructure, while he was inside. They were not initially sure if the "tissue" found was human or not to ID him.
Add the media coverage of Dr. Moore describes her as "complaining" as opposed to "reporting" or "identifying." Then the hospital's response is to describe her as "intimidating" to nurses as "knowledgeable"
The words we use matter. How much caution do we use, with whom, when? What tropes or associations are invoked? How does that populate the "data" in our brains that fill certain "buckets"? Who "complains" or "intimidates" vs "we don't know all the facts"
This is very important. I had been preferably using Black gifs for representation.
The nature of #communication is that how you intend it and how others may receive it will pass through many other filters as well as sources of trauma.
While I have not received any feedback that my gif use is inappropriate one should not wait to be told. Going to be sure to apply an additional lens and filter.
Caution: Some who call themselves #communication “experts” may be about promotion rather than reliable #DEI or results
In particular, when you look at who to trust or emulate on #SciComm or #MedTwitter, take note of who is effective at communicating their point, does not need to delete, can post on important topics with least misinterpretation, while maintaining the broadest audience.
The world (specifically healthcare) is not giving me good feels right now.
And:
I miss my cat
I miss NYC
I want bubble tea
Well, bubble tea has been ordered.
Puritan territory New England does not have the flavors I want at 10:27 p.m. but I realize that at least I do have bubble tea access in the first place.
As much as I now call Boston a village... it isn’t really.
I am amused by anyone on #MedTwitter who thinks I can be easily intimidated. Chile.. first I am Gen X. Then, I have lived through having gas masks distributed in case chemical war happened (when living in an oil compound). Then I have lived in places you hear gunshots routinely.
I experienced a ton of bullying, including (but not limited to) racial, as a child back when teachers told you the problem was you not being tough enough and they were not there to solve “your problems” for you. If a kid stole something, why’d you “let” him?
I have navigated the outspoken WOC in the workplace such that (despite folks who attempt to spread rumors otherwise) I have a perfectly “clean” record. No dark web searches will uncover “dirt” cuz there is none to be found.