Prosecutor informs that Delhi High Court recently passed an order wherein media houses have been asked to ensure that reports are run based on verified sources.
Today is the 8th day. We have seven more days. There are two more accused in the matter. Nikita's transit bail ends in three weeks. Shantanu's in ten days : Prosecutor
In her interrogation, she has shifted the burden to other accused. I have to confront her with other accused. They came to Delhi today morning: Prosecutor
This is the case of #toolkit. Those two accused are in protection
.the toolkit has hyperlinks that take you to different pages which are very dangerous: Prosecutor
The email was created by one of the accused. The story starts on Jna 11 when there is a Zoom meeting: Prosecutor
We are tracing the other participants. There were Dhaliwal, Anita Lal, Nikita and Shantanu: Prosecutor
Prosecutor says that Dhaliwal and Lal run the Poetic Justice Foundation organization that carries anti India publications.
They raise slogans that are anti India. There is an International Farmers Strike WhatsApp group : Prosecutor
We have no no other option but to confront #DishaRavi with the other accused who have protection. Nikita and Shantanu are part of the group : Prosecutor
We can't arrest Shantanu till he has protection. Nikita shares the toolkit with Dhaliwal. On February 3, Disha sends it to Greta Thunberg: Prosecutor
On the same day, the toolkit was deleted. Because it has against India hyperlinks: Prosecutor
There are 60-70 people more who participated in the Zoom meeting. We are investigating the case related to cyber.. experts are needed. We can't close all evidence until we confront her: Prosecutor
I was arrested on February 13. On 14th, I'm sent to 5 days PC remand. They are arguing as it it's her first remand : Agarwal
There is a distinction between the grant of PC and extension of PC in law : Agarwal
They finished the five and said three days JC. They do not tell that in the meantime I moved my bail application.. that time they didn't have making their allegations public : Agarwal
Only thing they wish to say is that they didn't have two people physically. Now they are there. And #DishaRavi has to be confronted.. what is so new today? That I change the nature of her custody. What is it that can be done only in police custody: Agarwal
If the IO wants to meet somebody after 15 days, is it precluded? .. they will move an application before the court. They have the right to interrogate me, confront me after moving an application: Agarwal
Agarwal says it is just a way to get #DishaRavi back to police custody.
They will come on their pre defined time and go back. They are under no restraint.. why should I be in policy custody to answer the same question? : Agarwal
What happens if I'm granted bail tomorrow? What is being asked to do today, please see its impact: Agarwal
Both things are different and in different courts : Prosecutor
Agarwal states that the present plea of PC remand couldn'tbe decided without telling the court that bail plea was heard for over three hours on Saturday and reserved for order on Tuesday.
Agarwal reads the application moved by @DelhiPolice
Same to same facts that were in the first remand..the same as they existed on 14th: Agarwal
Agarwal reads the Delhi High Court rules on grant of remand.
Remand ought to be granted on real necessity : Agarwal reads the rules.
Today after arguments on bail.. the issue is that they want to talk about everything else and everyone else to say that she did something wrong : Agarwal as he points out that #DishaRavi was not part of the Zoom meeting.
Agarwal continues to read the High Court Rules.
Agarwal refers to a Gujarat High Court judgement.
I'm in Bangalore. I was not here (at the relevant time) : Agarwal as he reads the judgement.
Those two persons are not in remand and the investigation is not throttled. Today investigation is through virtual conference links also: Agarwal as he argues that custody remand is not necessary
Level and the threshold is "absolute necessity": Agarwal
They have a valid requirment of interrogation. It can be met by confronting me with the other accused at the place (which is generally designated) : Agrawal
Agarwal highlights that bail is pending.
If five days PC is given, will the Sessions Judge change his order on bail? : Prosecutor
Prosecutor argues that there is no set formula for grant of bail and each case has to he seen on its own merit.
Police custody is not punishment. 14 days PC is our right. This may be advantageous to her. She's shifting blame .. : Prosecutor
We didn't make any unnecessary PC remand plea. It is not a petty case. It is a trans national case. It is a complex case. Our endeavour is to finish the investigation ASAP: Delhi Police officer
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul led bench decides to refer question on whether to count the day of remand for calculating time limit of 60 days for default bail & Whether chargesheet filed within the prescribed time period to a 3-judge bench. (,@dir_ed
Vs Kapil Wadhawan) #SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourt says question of interim bail to be considered at the earliest by the three judge bench.
Justice Kaul-- it may not be open for a 2 judge bench to consider these issues.
Singhvi-- they have been in jail for over 11 months. The legal issue is open.
@DrAMSinghvi : When a conflict in law is there the decision should be in favour of the accused.
Justice Kaul-- a larger bench must consider this issue. We will request CJI to constitute a bench at the earliest. The conflict may be capable of resolution by a 3 judge
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and Manish Pitale of #BombayHighCourt will give their verdict in the appeal filed by NIA challenging the bail granted by the Special NIA Court Mumbai to the person accused of joining the global terrorism outfit (ISIS).
Majeed, who travelled to Syria to allegedly join ISIS, was arrested in November 2014 under the UAPA after he returned from Syria. The lower court granted him bail on merits last year.
Matter was reserved for orders by High Court on February 5, 2021.
#Amazon vs Future: Delhi High Court begins hearing Amazon's appeal against the observations made by a Single Judge Bench while refusing to restrain the e-commerce company from writing to statutory authorities.
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by former Andhra Pradesh HC Chief Justice challenging an order passed by the AP High Court calling for a probe into his telephonic conversations with the District Munsif Magistrate casting aspersions on a sitting SC judge. #judiciary
Adv Prashant Bhushan: HC was hearing a matter seeking an enquiry on people not following COVID protocol. One suspended magistrate submitted a pen drive and showed my conversation with him. After it was leaked an enquiry was ordered upon
Bhushan: . I said yes conversation took place and some parts of the conversation happened. It was a private conversation and no criminal conspiracy was there. What enquiry is needed?
Senior Adv Harish Salve: Of course there is a need. We don't know what the conversation is about