When we always report, encourage reporting & consistently invoke due process within the system, we can create a safe system that counters bias. It should not be about who went to med school with whom, race, gender, age. It should not be about vigilante justice outside the system
A woman leader can experience gender bias yet also align with patriarchal structures that tend to silence female victims. Both can be true at the same time. A Black man can be harassed or overpoliced based on race in one domain and be correctly identified as a harasser in another
That is what makes it complicated. There are not people who are only victim or only abuser. There are not “good” or “bad” people rather actions that happen at specific times by specific individuals. Those who see selves as saviors or mascots can become entitled, full of hubris.
In politics, communication, leadership, etc this comes up over and over. Do we hold people accountable who are useful to an agenda, may share certain goals, may have done some good things?
Gillibrand, an alum of my high school, who led the charge vs Franken to resign, has been criticized for not being as intense now. But she is clear here. This is where it gets murky. Who decides when “tone” is “enough” beyond supporting due process?
My reporting this data entry error on behalf of a black family was seen as overly punitive. Except when I was a patient, a near miss potentially fatal med error could have killed me. The resident caught the error but did not report. So then no QI data.
The U.S. government is responsible for the this vaccine hesitancy from these past ethics violations that abused the hard work of humanity public health workers who had painstakingly gained trust over years. Trust takes time to rebuild.
@rezaaslan Honestly, we are past a point of thinking all brown is the same. There is tremendous diversity in South Asia.
The accent. The way of talking. The head movements. None of it is remotely Afghan. There was a way to actually represent Afghan or Pathan culture beyond casting.
@rezaaslan Asking the people whose identity is being used to either play the part or at least inform the character development is essential to moving past caricatures to representation.
As for brown savior: Mammies often “saved” their mistresses/masters.
@rezaaslan Key part of the article on way Mammies are portrayed.
I’d like to see how this sitcom would be different.
I get the argument that it is important to get sympathetic/likable Muslim characters on the screen. Maybe this is the extent of progress possible.
But was it?
Am grateful my #endometriosis and #fibroids only affects me severely one day a cycle and is not severe every cycle. Still that one day can make me unable to get out of bed or sit up without passing out. Severity worsens with stress.
Today I feel have my life back. Thank God.
Mind you, my definition of severe is “I pass out from pain.” I don’t know if it is really a good thing I self suppress so well that I don’t even feel or react to pain until it threatens my ability to stay conscious. I don’t glamorize “grit” that is a lack of self compassion
It is an accommodation to the pathology in the world we live that was apparent with the events this week. 6 Asian women killed but the compassion was for the killer who “had a bad day” by authorities while the women were mislabeled as sex workers to validate their deaths.
Sometimes you need a physician-child to physician-child call. “I hope you know none of this is your fault.”
Thankfully I have been really effective at not going down dark paths of coulda shoulda woulda.
I helped Daddy stay in right frame of mind.
We live in shaming society.
Still, it meant a lot that someone I went to school with called with that, likely sharing what he knows from loss of a parent as well.
The people who have lost a parent get it.
I can see why there are grief circles.
Some people get it.
People outside of clinical medicine (or even in it) also can assume doctors have unending power, privilege, access.
One auntie “with your girls as daughters I assumed she had the best of everything.” She likely did not hear what she said to a grieving daughter. Implies failure.
On reading this my thoughts:
-not a primary care field
-two-specialist couple
-focus in procedures and lucrative call, not humans being treated
-these “options” possible if one has chronic illness, elder care, etc
-derisive towards colleagues
-no interest in equity
It’s great that doctor made it work to retire at 43 and have gotten the math right all along. If one is going to judge colleagues, though, be ready for the reverse. We have a rising maternal mortality rate and increasing disparity. IUDs are an important part of reducing that, yes
Even if we stick just to ob/gyn field: some may wish to not only be the “IUD queen” (birth control is SUPER important - not at all discounting it), what about the ob/gyn who chooses to live in NYC and focus in whole person care for WOC who do give birth?