There’s clearly a public interest in whether the Attorney General Christian Porter is a fit and proper person person to hold the office. This is a separate question altogether from the question of whether or not he is criminally guilty of any crime. #auspol
It is still not clear whether Porter was being entirely honest with the public at his press conference last week on a number of issues including whether he had had an opportunity to respond to the allegations in the anonymous letter prior to the allegations being published.
Arthur Moses has previously stood for preselection for the Liberal Party. Why is his voice being heard loud and clear but not that of at least four female lawyers who disagree with him? #auslaw#auspol#EnoughIsEnough#March4Justice#FourCorners
It is well understood that there will be no criminal trial. But the lack of support from for an independent inquiry, properly framed and conducted, on the basis that this would undermine the #RuleOfLaw is highly questionable when those voices are politically aligned #auspol
Separately, it is also highly disturbing to hear calls for lawyers to avoid getting involved in the conversation or being political “activists”. Particularly when prominent male voices are given such wide-reaching platforms to express their views. #auslaw#auspol
This feels like just another attempt to silence women and is entirely non-sensical. Lawyers are trained to consider the facts and the evidence and make arguments accordingly. @AusWomenLawyers
They are therefore very well placed to contribute to the political discussions provided they avoid conflicts of interest, breaches of confidentiality or breaches of their employment contracts. Many politicians are lawyers. Lawyers have an important role in contributing to debate.
Many young lawyers and particularly female lawyers are discouraged from using their voices publicly. This is detrimental to public discourse and prevents society from moving to a more equitable place. #auslaw#auspol
AFR view: “The Heydon case was one of inappropriate and unacceptable workplace behaviour. In the case of Mr Porter it is alleged criminality that is at stake. And for that there is only one place: the criminal justice system and the court of law.”
“Internal research showed that swing voters soon tired of the Higgins story....After a few days, it morphed into frustration that Higgins had yet to go to the police.”
Was any “internal research” conducted into why rape victims don’t go to the police? What action have the police actually taken in relation to Higgins? Has the man been interviewed or charged? Is he even still in Australia? The public are currently in the dark on these questions.
#Accountability for conduct is not limited to the criminal jurisdiction “An inquiry may be able to interview other persons that were present. Mr Porter mentioned there were four of them [on the debating team] and that they may have gone out together that evening.”
“He holds the apex position for the legal profession and his conduct – and integrity – must be beyond approach.
“An independent inquiry would be able to look into whether or not he is a fit and proper person to hold the position of Attorney-General in the Cabinet”
This is really quite bizarre... Christian Porter says he was not given opportunity to respond to allegations before they were published (anonymously) by the ABC. But also he would not have read them anyway as it would have been “inappropriate”?? #auspoltheguardian.com/australia-news…
Christian Porter: “No journalist has put the detail of the allegations to me in a way that would allow seeking a response, not ever.” What does this statement even mean? It does not make sense. #auspol
He said the same thing before Canberra Bubble episode. But @Milliganreports says: “We gave those ministers...two-and-a-half weeks’ notice of the story and … they didn’t answer any of our questions,” #auspol