Solutions have been put forward. @TamePunk has called for a national definition on consent, many have asked for consent training in schools and the Respect@Work report has sat with Porter for a year. Look at the thread below, there are many solutions.
'Her life and death are a tragedy. Especially for her family, who have expressed concerns that, perhaps due to mental illness that included a bipolar disorder, she may have imagined the rape'
You published that @vanOnselenP, you're part of the reason why women don't come forward
You also wrote: "She suffered from long bouts of serious mental illness.'
I don't think that's helping women come forward either @vanOnselenP. Mental health issues have nothing to do with the legitimacy of a rape claim and naturally, victims will battle mental health issues.
On Insiders, you said: “At the micro level though, if it’s someone you know and if they claim that they're innocent, boy it’s a difficult issue.”
Again, not a statement that would encourage victims to come forward @vanOnselenP!
You also tweeted this @vanOnselenP. Maybe you're friend Christian Porter is innocent, but your conflict of interest like your Tweet about reading 'The Trial' is entirely inappropriate.
I struggle to see Peter how you can do all that I've listed above and then write "What those failings exactly are is clear enough: low numbers of women coming forward when sexually assaulted."
Surely you can see that your previous behaviour isn't helping women come forward.
If a woman is raped, assaulted or harassed by a politician or someone with power & influence tomorrow @vanOnselenP; it's quite possible that she might not go to Police, just in case her rapist is good friends with a journalist who might discredit her in a national paper!
Such as the Respect@Work report which the Government has had for over a year now and done nothing with. Why doesn't your article mention this @vanOnselenP? #ThisisNotJournalism
Stop writing about Christian Porter. Do you not know what a conflict of interest is Peter?
Are we allowed to shoot the man with the clear conflict of interest?
.@vanOnselenP writes a few paragraphs on how the legal system might change, having written in a previous paragraph "the task of fixing what has long been broken must be taken up by experts".
You aren't an expert on this issue Peter. You shouldn't be writing on it.
What vigilante justice are you referring to @vanOnselenP? Is this enough pathetic attempt to defend your friend Chrisitan Porter?
In summary, I cannot fathom how Peter has written this article having entirely ignored the excellent solutions and ideas put forward by many intelligent people already. I also don't understand how Peter has written this article given his previous articles and commentary.
Have you forgotten @vanOnselenP that you used your platform to discredit a dead woman and defend an alleged rapist that is your friend?
The full report is titled Respect@Work: National Inquiry into Sexual Harassment in Australian Workplaces. Attorney-General @cporterwa received this report on the 29/01/20, over a year ago now. Yet he has done nothing with it.
In Commissioner @Kate_Jenkins_ forward, she reports that the Human Rights Commission has conducted for surveys since 2003. One in three people have experienced sexual harassment in the workplace over the past 5 years.
It's not complex at all. We want a host and program that is balanced. We want a program that holds the current Government to account, rather than the opposition. We want a program that presents corruption as a continued pattern with this Government rather than isolated events.
When Gladys lies to ICAC we don't want #abc730 to conclude she has done nothing wrong. We don't want a host that lies about being trapped in Victoria. We don't want Richard Colbeck given an interview with softball questions when he finally accepts an interview.
An unusual situation article here from Nick Tabakoff. Terrible journalism, defending terrible journalism. A short thread. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ #auspol#LeightheLiar#thisisnotjournalism
Journalists hate Twitter because they can't control the right of reply and they can't silence criticism. Twitter users are entitled to 'pile-on' whoever they want, whether it be justified (as it was in this case) or not.
A stupid question that had already been asked by other journalists over the weekend. Sales received the same answer that Dan had given previously!
Australians will be among the first in the world to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, if it proves successful, through an agreement between the Australian Government and UK-based drug company AstraZeneca. - Morrison Media Release 19/8/20. A thread on Vaccine Announcements! ⬇️⬇️#auspol
“The Oxford vaccine is one of the most advanced and promising in world, and under this deal we have secured early access for every Australian,” - @ScottMorrisonMP
Despite promises we would be 'among the first' and 'early access', not one Australian have received a vaccine!
Morrison's vaccine program is another case of announcements and re-announcements with no actual outcome for Australians. It's all smirk and mirrors. Photo ops and no follow ups. This thread will list every major Media Release / Announcement on the vaccine to Australians!
1⃣ Both NSW and VIC used private security
2⃣ The ADF were never offered for security
3⃣ The majority of deaths were in private aged care
4⃣ The Aged Care RC and Senate Committee blames those deaths on the Federal Government ⬇️⬇️⬇️ #auspol#springst#DimTim#FACTS
5⃣ Businesses in other states are still on Jobkeeper
6⃣ The whole country had job loses
7⃣ The Coate Inquiry could not confirm that the ADF were offered for security
8⃣ The Coate Inquiry said that Private Security may still have been required even if the ADF were offered and used
9⃣ NSW used one of the same security companies as VIC
🔟Theviruss has broken out of HQ in several states including NSW
Insulting, stupid, homophobic, biphobic or transphobic questions asked during the debate on the Change or Suppression (Conversion) Practices Prohibition Bill 2020 last night. Naturally with the member named and shamed. A thread! ⬇️⬇️⬇️ #auspol#springst#LGBTQ
"If, for example, somebody goes to them and
says, ‘I feel that I need a gender transition’, and the person says, ‘I don’t think that’s a very good idea’,
does that make them liable to be charged?" - Bernie Finn
.@JaclynSymes excellent answer "I assume you would be referring to seeking advice from a medical practitioner in relation to gender transition, and nothing in this bill changes the advice, support and medical treatment that a qualified medical professional deems appropriate."