In light of the situation in #Brazil and reports of more severe #COVID19 in young persons, we should consider whether antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is playing a role.
It has important implications for the rest of the world. 1/🧵
In ADE, an initial mild infection can be followed by more severe illness upon reinfection. Non-neutralizing antibodies are thought to play a role. The potential mechanism for #SARSCoV2 is likely different from #dengue. See "b" ⬇️
Antibody-independent mechanisms also exist. 2/
On an individual level, ADE (or ERD as above) may be clinically indistinguishable from non-ADE severe disease. A history of #COVID19 or baseline Ab+ could raise suspicion.
At a population level, ADE may only present as an increase in rates of hospitalization and death. 3/
There are several reasons why ADE might show up first in Brazil:
🔹P.1 emergence w/immune escape
🔹Waning immunity in those infected in early 2020
🔹High transmission driving reinfections w/P.1
🔹High case numbers, making it easier to detect ADE
🔹Low vaccine coverage
4/
To be clear, I'm referring to ADE resulting from *natural* primary infection, *not* vaccination.
Thus far there is no evidence of vaccine-associated ADE, although we haven't seen P.1 circulation in a vaccinated population and as vaccine immunity wanes. 5/ medpagetoday.com/special-report…
Irrespective of ADE, the reports of more severe disease in younger populations in the UK and Canada (BC) are concerning. @DrZoeHyde has a good thread on this, noting that the preprint data comes with many caveats. 6/
These potential attributes of P.1 have major implications for public health measures, vaccine development and vaccine deployment, particularly in places where vaccines will not be available for some time due to supply constraints and inequitable access. 7/
This thread is intended to stimulate discussion. Would welcome views of expert colleagues on whether ADE and/or greater virulence of P.1 could be contributing to the picture in Brazil and elsewhere. 8/
That we haven't seen ADE after vaccination doesn't mean it can't occur after natural infection, which elicits a broad range of antibody responses. Vaccine immunity should be more consistent and robust.
To reiterate, this thread is about natural, not vaccine-associated ADE. 9/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Direct protection from vaccines (protection of the vaccinated person) goes a long way toward limiting illness and death, but indirect protection massively amplifies the impact. Here’s a good explainer from @ZoeMcLaren. 2/
We need to maximize *indirect* protection to:
🔹Protect *vaccinated* persons who are still susceptible to disease
🔹Protect those who haven’t been vaccinated, including children
🔹Prevent Long COVID
🔹Protect everyone against variants.
The emerging, expected evidence that #vaccines reduce transmission is a game-changer, but the focus on herd immunity can give the impression that we won’t see a benefit until most are vaccinated. Not true. 1/ @apoorva_nyc
The value of transmission-reducing vaccines begins well before two people make contact. By reducing infections in a community, vaccines make it less likely for either of those persons to be carrying the virus, reducing risk substantially. 3/ @erinbanco politico.com/news/2021/03/0…
More about the complexity of "traditional" vaccine approaches below.
These timelines assume the process has been "scaled up" and everything is in place & ready to go: facility, equipment, raw materials, etc. Unexpected issues can add weeks or months. 2/
As variants spread and #vaccines are deployed, we’re not sequencing enough to keep up w/the virus.
As a stopgap, we should sequence viruses from every vaccinated person who develops #COVID to identify vaccine escape mutations. 1/ washingtonpost.com/health/2021/01…
We call these “vaccine breakthroughs,” and we’ll see more of them as the B.1.351 and P.1 variants spread. Sequencing all breakthrough viruses will help us to track those variants and identify new mutations that might contribute to vaccine escape. 2/
Back in October, I said the Warp Speed timelines were extraordinarily optimistic given the inherent risks of vaccine development, manufacturing and distribution. All of those risks and others have materialized. 1/
Much of the risk is in "scaling up" production to produce large volumes of vaccine in a facility, and “scaling out” to manufacturing partners to expand capacity. This thread is about vaccine manufacturing and the challenges we’ll continue to face. 2/
The good news is we're likely to see higher levels of vaccine efficacy against variant-associated severe disease and death. J&J has provided the first evidence of this in their press release (insufficient severe dz in the Novavax interim analysis). 3/