#Breaking: #MadrasHighCourt opines that it appears that the Tamil Nadu govt may not have followed applicable UGC guidelines in cancelling college arrear exams in August 2020 amid #COVID19; suggests that State come up with a Plan B after consulting the UGC.
"Though the relevant notification (Aug 26, 2020) referred to evaluation being carried out on the basis of the guidelines issued by the UGC or AICTE, it appears that AICTE did not agree to the proposal and the UGC guidelines may not have been followed at all."
"It is inconceivable that a whole masse of students will be certified to have qualified in a system without having basic knowledge in respect of key aspects thereof."
"What appears to have been done by State may be to treat all those who wanted to rewrite their exams as deemed to have passed without conducting any form of test or evaluation. The UGC guidelines did not provide for such a scenario nor is it acceptable to the court."
Court has now directed the State to furnish details, University/ college-wise, on the number of students who sought to re-write arrear exams and the number of such students who had passed or failed. Next hearing on April 15.
"In the meantime, the State and UGC should put their heads together to suggest any ameliorative measures that may be taken by way of an examination or some other method."
No doubt lakhs of students who thought they cleared the course after writing final exam may have to be held back because they did not clear previous papers, but, unqualified persons cannot be certified to have qualified to pursue professional courses or higher studies: #MadrasHC
The UGC and the State should indicate what would serve the interests of the relevant students the best without compromising on the sanctity of the system, notwithstanding the pandemic: #MadrasHighCourt
During the hearing, CJ Sanjib Banerjee orally observed: It sends a completely wrong signal.. the signal appears to be that as long as they have paid the fee and we earned the revenue, they are allowed to pass.
Before adjourning the matter for the day, CJ Banerjee added: "There has to be plan B. You may succeed in dislodging our order ultimately. But in the interest of the students, there must be plan B."
#SupremeCourt to hear Centre's application to close the criminal trials pending in India against two Italian marines accused of killing two fishermen off the coast of Kerala in 2012.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had said the victims’ families have been compensated
SG: You are aware of about the incident. Dispute was who can prosecute the Italian Marines. It was held that trial will be by Govt of Italy. Italian government was directed to compensate the families of those who were killed.
SG: Indians are the best negotiators and we have negotiated a good deal. They have paid 10 crores more. Victims have accepted it now
A five-member committee to be constituted comprising of eminent persons, experts well-versed with archaeology, two members preferably from minority community.
An expert to be appointed as observer for the committee
Committee prime purpose is to find whether religious structure standing at the disputed set is a superimposition, alteration or addition or if there is structural overlapping of any kind over any other religious structure
#MadrasHighCourt seeks response on the anti-corruption set up in the State, the degree of independence afforded to the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) and the number of corruption cases attended to in the last 3 financial years.
During the hearing today, Court also posed queries on how secure the DVAC is and the extent to which its own officers have indulged in #corruption.
“…we want to know how secure is your Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption", CJ Sanjib Banerjee orally observed
"We have no doubt you have a very attractive website, 20,000 pages of nothing written, but we want to get to the meat of the matter… Or are we in such a fool's paradise that we have to believe that there is no corruption over there?“ CJ Banerjee remarked.
Special Bench of Supreme Court led by CJI SA Bobde to hear a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari seeking appointment of Additional Judges to High Courts under Article 128 of the Constitution #SupremeCourt #judgesvacancy
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul led bench of the #SupremeCourt to hear appeals by Maharashtra govt and former Home Minister Anil Deshmukh against the Bombay HC order allowing CBI probe into allegations made by Param Bir Singh against @AnilDeshmukhNCP #SupremeCourt @OfficeofUT
Senior Adv Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi: I appear for Maharastra. Note three striking things. On March 21 one Jayshree Patil complains within 48 hrs she files a writ on March 23 is not on board. No listing. Param Birs writ was listed on March 23
Singhvi: On Marcv 31, matter was heard only on maintainability. The AG of Maharashtra argues on the same and division bench records that hearing was on maintainability, admission and interim order. #SupremeCourt
The cases goes back to 2000 and concerns alleged irregularities relating to the issue of 12 crore equity shares in January 2000 by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) at a price of Rs. 75 per share to 38 allottee entities.
As per Regulation 11(1) of Takeover Regulations, RIL was obligated not to make additional acquisition of more than 5% of voting rights in any financial year unless it made a public announcement to acquire shares.