It would be swell if @JohnMooneyST
influenced his editors to correct the headline at least. No #RuAF 🇷🇺 aircraft were in Irish airspace at any time. That's misinformation at best, #disinformation at worst; they were in international airspace the whole time thetimes.co.uk/article/concer…
Journalists are regularly fed bad info by their trusted sources who want to mislead them and spin the story, so I can hardly blame @JohnMooneyST who did his due diligence. The Flight Information Region #FIR is the correct term, the international airspace controlled by Irish ATC.
Sovereign Irish airspace extends 12 Nautical Miles out to sea, the flight information region #FIR extends hundreds of miles out to sea. #NORAD is much more diligent in explaining that difference, as they do in the linked PDF below, from a few years back.
Point being, this is a frequent mistake that is made by journalists, as well as intentionally fed to journalists, but I think it's worst in the UK press, which seem to get it wrong most often. I presume it's the same sources who are deliberately misleading reputable journalists.
What's the over-under for the article to be corrected so it's accurate and truthful?
The Times UK went to press with #misinformation, and made no corrections despite repeated attempts to contact the journalist, editor, and peers. Since no corrections were made, this article has become an example of #disinformation in the media.
Comparing the little purple line shown on OpenStreetMaps (which is an unofficial source - but matches the sovereign territory of the countries shown) with the Flight Information Regions, shows you the difference between sovereign airspace, and the FIR.
The RAF published this fantastic explainer in September 2020 regarding a QRA intercept, and I hope they publish this kind of content more often, it's really informative, and uses all the right terms, because they're the RAF, and they're careful about that.
In March of 2020 Simon Carswell correctly reported the story, using the right terminology, but his editor clickbaited the headline, making it sensational and inaccurate, at best misinformation, but made no attempt to correct it. Is this endemic to Ireland?
Here you see the dramatic *decrease* in RuAF intercepts in 2017, over the previous ten years. I bet you don't remember that being reported on, because it wasn't.
🇨🇦✈️ One of two #RCAF-leased King Airs (C-GSYC) were maybe making a VIP transport between Winnipeg, Sault Ste. Marie, and Trenton. I call these the shadow VIP transport fleet, b/c they seem to ferry the brass around (incl #NORAD). #CFC1648#C076A3
Oh yes, I remember @mikercarpenter, he was spreading #disinformation about the Russian Open Skies Treaty-certified plane spying on Chicago back in 2019, when they were in transit on their way to Cali, not taking pics at all.
It's like a trip down memory lane! I wonder what #disinformation@mikercarpenter has been spreading about the Open Skies Treaty since? Well he locked his account so you can't find out. Too bad for you.
🇷🇺🇺🇸 #Russia|n Navy Pacific Fleet Project 864 (NATO: Vishnya-class) Kareliya|Карелия is operating near #Hawaii, monitoring missile tests, and has been for well over a week, per open sources.
Neither #NORAD or #USNavy tell us anything until we tell them; normal.
Let's review what a fact is, what a Top Secret-classified source might be, what a Secret-classified intelligence report is, what misinformation is, and what disinformation is.
Your car is parked at home. It's location is a fact. You put it there. You may even see it out your windows, it is indisputably true, it is there, it is a fact, there is no tricks, no smoke or mirrors. It's just a #fact.
There is an American spy satellite (ha, many) circling the globe, it's capabilities are Top Secret, and the imagery it takes is Top Secret.
Using imagery from that satellite, a gov't analyst writes a Secret report that states your car is in your driveway, per Top Secret intel.