Are these issues we can interfere with, before the trial court takes a view on your application? Court asks. It has to be done in a reasonable time, and we have already said that.
By not taking up the case, the trial court has denied me of my rights. After securing bail, it says it does not have time to do it? Your Lordships' judgment is not being implemented: Aggarwal
Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad wants to demonstrate facts to explain what is happening. While imputations are being made against State, we are following Court's orders
Even if today the trial court passes an order at 4, it will take time to reach, and the same delay will occur. We are asking that it be sent by email: Pujari
We are going to direct counsel for the parties to appear before the trial court at 12 noon. You can make your submissions, and the court will take a decision: Court
You have sought time to verify Aadhaar numbers? Justice Bhambhani. Where does Aadhaar number come into the picture? Do you follow this process in other cases?
Order was reserved in both our applications. Every time, there is shifting of goalposts. They came to our house for verification twice, but they didn't do their job: Pujari
Discrepancies with respect to permanent address of Asif Iqbal Sinha being pointed out by SPP Prasad. These are factors that trial court must look at and decide: Prasad
We are not going to monitor the proceedings before the trial court. We can only say that it has to deal with the matter with promptitude. Our order has to be implemented, there cannot be two views on that: Court
Supreme Court hears an urgent plea by the father of a 38 year old boy who was allegedly killed in a "staged fake encounter" and was subject to grievous torture in custody. Father seeks permission for autopsy #supremecourt
Adv Ishma Randhawa: Petitioner was asked not to open the body packing saying it was chemically treated. when it was opened back home there were multiple injuries. when a second post mortem was sought it was dismissed and hc dismissed it on basis of jurisdiction
Justice Shah: Cannot you approach Calcutta HC
Adv Randhawa: In this case, there is a conspiracy.
Supreme Court hears a plea filed seeking directions for waiving the final examination of final year Post-graduate Medical Residents & constitution of a Joint Expert Committee for examining and recommending on their prayers #supremecourt
Sr Adv Sanjay Hegde: Prayers 2,3,4 are still pending. this is not adverse litigation. These students are on front line of covid.
Justice Shah: See second prayer which survives. How can they be promoted without exams?
Justice Banerjee: How can we pass a direction like this? You can’t be promoted without exams in this case
Hegde: But i can be considered notionally and service benefits be given
Justice Banerjee: we need not pass orders. universities are not even a party to this case
One of the lawyers for petitioners says they went to NHRC which then forwarded complaint to top police official who the sends it to the local police station.
The local police then says you have to face consequences. It is a vicious cycle.
BJP candidate for 2021 elections Kashinath Biswas alleges ransacking and destruction of his residence.
Shows photos.
"Is this your house," Bench asks.
"Yes," his lawyer says.
Bench asks him to follow the procedure in terms of the order dated June 4 to lodge complaint.
CBI had raised preliminary objection to the petition in the previous hearing. However hearing was adjourned to permit intervenors to file appropriate proceedings and other parties to file their responses.
#SupremeCourt to hear appeals by West Bengal government and State Law Minister Moloy Ghatak challenging a June 9 order of #CalcuttaHC refusing to take their reply affidavits on record in the transfer plea filed by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the #NaradaCase
The plea states that the rights of the State government and the Law Minister shouldn’t be closed "especially when CBI has been allowed to file additional affidavits at different stages." @MamataOfficial@AITCofficial#supremecourt
The Calcutta High Court in its June 9 order had noted that, "they (CM, law minister and state) have waited for the arguments in the case to be substantially completed before seeking to place on record their pleadings in response." #calcuttahighcourt#supremecourt#naradacase