The first thing most people miss (and I do mean Most!), is ...
GOALS.
Yes, you are doing SEO - but:
* SEO is not a goal
* Ranking is not a goal
* Traffic is not a goal (unless you are ad-rev based)
Money, Opportunity and Visibility are Goals.
SEO is just a method!
>>>
3/*
So the first thing you should be "scoring" your priorities by is the Goal they will be contributing to.
In most cases, that's going to be Money (Rev., Profit, via Traffic, via Rankings, via Keywords etc.)
But SEO can be for other goals too!
>>>
4/*
SEO can be used for Visibility (think of Perception and Reputation, raising Awareness, building the Brand etc.).
There's also Opportunity (Awareness, Exposure, building relationships etc.).
So sort your goals and get ready to apply them.
>>>
5/*
Then we can break things down into two broad types:
* Positives
* Negatives
Now, you can be light with these;
+ Value/Gain
- Effort/Difficulty
Or you can get more detailed;
+ Scope/Influence
+ Probability/Confidence
- Cost/Resources
- Risk/Urgency
>>>
6/*
You can also decide whether to be simple or complicated with the calculations.
You can score each item 1-5, 1-10, 1-100.
You can add the positives, add the negatives, then subtract negatives from positives,
or do multipliers and divide positive by negative.
>>>
7/*
To help, here's a list of various potential factors to consider.
1. Goal (!):
Money, Visibility and Opportunity >
Reach, Influence, Perception, Reputation, Revenue, Profit, Awareness and Loyalty
2. Value (+):
Gain, Impact and Influence
>>>
8/*
3. Potential (+):
Probability and Confidence
4. Scope (+):
Size, Amplitude and Quantity
5. Cost (-):
Time, Resources, Workload and Requirements
6. Effort (-):
Complexity and Difficulty
7. Risk (-)
Dangers, Errors and Resistance.
>>>
9/*
Now, you can substitute the words, or expand them out ... or just use general labels and lump everything together ...
... so long as you are factoring in what counts!
You can then score up each and every possible approach/item, and then sort.
But you can go further!
>>>
10/*
I like to "tag" my tasks with "influence".
Does it impact Rankings, User Experience or Conversions?
The more that any task covers, the more important it is
(consider first render time -vs- adjusting headings to include a keyword ... one does all 3, one does mainly 1)
>>>
11/*
You can also tag in "speed" (or "time to effect").
Some things take a lot longer for G to react to than others (adding canonical link elements -vs- rewriting 100 pages of content).
Once you factor in things like these, you have a seriously ugly spreadsheet!
:D
>>>
12/*
But, that spreadsheet will enable you to score and sort your tasks, in a way that provides the maximum benefit to the business/site.
Then you get to "optimise" the priorities!
(Yes - I did just say that!)
Review the tasks, and see how you can deploy for effect.
>>>
13/*
If you have multiple people available -
you can delegate the tasks.
Some tasks are far faster to implement, and some show returns faster -
you can alternate between impact and speed.
No - it's not for the faint of heart.
No - you don't have to do it all.
But do prioritise
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
: Writing about covered topics :
Chances are, you've clicked on a link to a piece ... and been disappointed.
It's either nigh identical to 1+ other pieces you've read,
or it's just fluff wrapping keywords.
Do Not produce that sort of content.
>>>
3/*
If the topic is already covered, you need to make yours "better".
Add more recent information/data.
Add insights from experience.
Take a different perspective.
Cover aspects the rest miss, or go deeper than they do.
Okay, I didn't even get to the list of 9 summarised points before I started itching.
It looks like the definition of "evergreen content" is based on it's ranking/traffic consistency,
not it's relevance/topical durability.
(Not the same things).
@aleyda@remotersnet * Schedule multiple meetings each and every day.
* Failing to have a a proper comms system in place.
* Not ensuring everyone has the right comms software/apps
* Not ensuring people know how to use the software/apps
* Failing to realise not everyone has access to good internet
@aleyda@remotersnet * Making last minute schedule changes and failing t notify properly
* Not making use of established collaborative tools
* Trying to work/make things the same as Real Life/In Person
* Treating comms as unidirectional, (a talk vs a meeting)
* Not considering the home environment
@aleyda@remotersnet * Assuming no travel means people will start earlier and finish later
* People failing to separate/juggle home/work
* Family not comprehending the shift
* Failing to ensure people are able to access the work-network externally
* Not providing adequate (or any) training
To begin with, you are unlikely to rank for shorter terms - so you have to go with long-tail.
Produce content for each stage & collection of terms per stage. This not only increases the number of terms you are likely to rank for, but naturally means lower competition.
>>>
/3
Over time, your site gains "weight", and it is easier to rank for shorter terms.
But you still produce content for each stage, and you still target longer queries.
Just be mindful of "term value".
Longtail may be "easier", but typically has small audiences.